Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Aug;50(8):2622-32.
doi: 10.1002/art.20446.

What is the most appropriate radiologic scoring method for ankylosing spondylitis? A comparison of the available methods based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials filter

Astrid J B Wanders  1 , Robert B M Landewé, Anneke Spoorenberg, Maxime Dougados, Sjef van der Linden, Herman Mielants, Hille van der Tempel, Désirée M F M van der Heijde
Affiliations
Comparative Study

What is the most appropriate radiologic scoring method for ankylosing spondylitis? A comparison of the available methods based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials filter

Astrid J B Wanders et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To select the most appropriate radiologic scoring method for the evaluation of radiographic progression in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in clinical trials.

Methods: The validity of the currently available methods, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI), the Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (SASSS), and the modified SASSS (M-SASSS), was tested according to the aspects of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials filter: truth, discrimination (reliability and sensitivity to change), and feasibility, using radiographs of 133 patients at 4 different time points (baseline, 1 year, 2 years, and 4 years). One observer scored these sets in chronological order. To assess interobserver reliability, a second observer scored radiographs of 20 patients at the 4 different time points.

Results: After 4 years, 9% and 8% of patients showed changes >0 in the sacroiliac (SI) joints and hips, respectively. Independent of the method chosen, approximately 40% of patients showed changes in both the lumbar and cervical spine. Therefore, it was concluded that, for the assessment of progression, SI joints and hips are of minor importance. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) varied from 0.87 to 0.98 and ICCs for intraobserver scores varied from 0.96 to 0.99. Concerning progression scores, only the ICC for the M-SASSS measured after 2 years remained acceptable (0.82). The intraobserver scores for progression after 2 years of followup were an ICC of 0.93 for the BASRI, an ICC of 0.79 for the SASSS, and an ICC of 0.95 for the M-SASSS. Concerning sensitivity to change, it was found that the M-SASSS classified the highest percentage of patients with a change >0.

Conclusion: The M-SASSS is the most appropriate method by which to score the radiographic progression in AS patients in clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types