'Thermal taste' predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste and flavor
- PMID: 15337686
- DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjh065
'Thermal taste' predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste and flavor
Abstract
Individual differences in taste perception have been explained in part by variations in peripheral innervation associated with the genetic ability to taste the bitter substances PTC and PROP. In the present study we report evidence of another source of individual differences that is independent of taste stimulus, taste quality, or gustatory nerve. Individuals who perceived taste from thermal stimulation alone (thermal taste) gave significantly higher taste ratings to chemical stimuli--often by a factor of >2:1--than did individuals who perceived no taste from thermal stimulation. This was true for all taste stimuli tested (sucrose, saccharin, sodium chloride, citric acid, quinine sulfate, MSG and PROP), for all three gustatory areas of the mouth (anterior tongue, posterior tongue and soft palate) and for whole-mouth stimulation. Moreover, the same individuals reported stronger sensations from the olfactory stimulus vanillin, particularly when it was sensed retronasally. The generality of the thermal-taster advantage and its extension to an olfactory stimulus suggests that it arises from individual differences in CNS processes that are involved in perception of both taste and flavor.
Similar articles
-
Chemesthesis and taste: evidence of independent processing of sensation intensity.Physiol Behav. 2005 Nov 15;86(4):526-37. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.08.038. Epub 2005 Sep 30. Physiol Behav. 2005. PMID: 16199067
-
Thermal taste, PROP responsiveness, and perception of oral sensations.Physiol Behav. 2008 Nov 28;95(4):581-90. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.08.009. Epub 2008 Aug 22. Physiol Behav. 2008. PMID: 18773913 Clinical Trial.
-
Individual differences in oral thermosensation.Physiol Behav. 2006 Jul 30;88(4-5):417-24. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.04.011. Epub 2006 Jun 2. Physiol Behav. 2006. PMID: 16733061 Clinical Trial.
-
Genetic variation in taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and its relationship to taste perception and food selection.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1170:126-39. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.03916.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009. PMID: 19686122 Review.
-
The tongue map and the spatial modulation of taste perception.Curr Res Food Sci. 2022 Mar 18;5:598-610. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.02.004. eCollection 2022. Curr Res Food Sci. 2022. PMID: 35345819 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Relationships Between Common Measurements of Taste Function.Chemosens Percept. 2015;8(1):11-18. doi: 10.1007/s12078-015-9183-x. Epub 2015 Jun 5. Chemosens Percept. 2015. PMID: 26110045 Free PMC article.
-
Stimulus-Dependent Effects of Temperature on Bitter Taste in Humans.Chem Senses. 2017 Feb;42(2):153-160. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjw115. Epub 2016 Nov 20. Chem Senses. 2017. PMID: 28119357 Free PMC article.
-
Sweet Thermal Taste: Perceptual Characteristics in Water and Dependence on TAS1R2/TAS1R3.Chem Senses. 2020 Apr 17;45(3):219-230. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjaa009. Chem Senses. 2020. PMID: 32072157 Free PMC article.
-
From receptors to the brain: Psychophysical clues to taste physiology.Curr Opin Physiol. 2021 Apr;20:154-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.12.010. Epub 2021 Jan 19. Curr Opin Physiol. 2021. PMID: 33585729 Free PMC article.
-
Somatosensory factors in taste perception: effects of active tasting and solution temperature.Physiol Behav. 2012 Nov 5;107(4):488-95. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 May 17. Physiol Behav. 2012. PMID: 22609629 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources