Gender differences in chemosensory perception and event-related potentials
- PMID: 15337687
- DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjh066
Gender differences in chemosensory perception and event-related potentials
Abstract
The present study investigated chemosensory gender differences by means of ratings of total nasal chemosensory intensity, unpleasantness and sensory irritation and simultaneous recordings of chemosensory event-related potentials (CSERPs) for three concentrations of the olfactory/trigeminal stimulus pyridine in 19 women and 17 men, all young adults. Results show that, compared to men, women gave higher intensity and unpleasantness ratings, in particular for the highest stimulus concentration. The gender differences in perceived intensity are reflected in the signal-to-noise ratio of the individual CSERP averages, revealing more identifiable early components (P1, N1) in women than in men. The late positive component, labeled P2/P3, displayed larger amplitudes at all electrode sites and shorter latencies at Cz, in women compared to men. The effects of increased pyridine concentration on perception (larger in women) and CSERPs (similar across gender) imply that the two measures involve partially different neural processing. CSERP component identifiability is proposed here as a general means of assessing signal-to-noise ratio of the CSERPs.
Similar articles
-
Olfactory and chemosomatosensory function in pregnant women assessed with event-related potentials.Physiol Behav. 2005 Sep 15;86(1-2):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.07.022. Physiol Behav. 2005. PMID: 16112693
-
Chemosensory event-related potentials in relation to side of stimulation, age, sex, and stimulus concentration.Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Jun;117(6):1367-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 May 2. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006. PMID: 16651024
-
Chemosensory perception and event-related potentials in self-reported chemical hypersensitivity.Int J Psychophysiol. 2005 Feb;55(2):243-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.08.003. Int J Psychophysiol. 2005. PMID: 15649555
-
Assessment of olfactory and trigeminal function using chemosensory event-related potentials.Neurophysiol Clin. 2006 Mar-Apr;36(2):53-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2006.03.005. Epub 2006 Apr 19. Neurophysiol Clin. 2006. PMID: 16844543 Review.
-
Assessment of chemosensory function using electroencephalographic techniques.Rhinology. 2012 Mar;50(1):13-21. doi: 10.4193/Rhino11.126. Rhinology. 2012. PMID: 22469600 Review.
Cited by
-
Qualitative and Quantitative Sex-Related Differences in the Perception of Single Molecules from Coffee Headspace.Foods. 2024 Oct 11;13(20):3239. doi: 10.3390/foods13203239. Foods. 2024. PMID: 39456301 Free PMC article.
-
Olfaction in the psychosis prodrome: electrophysiological and behavioral measures of odor detection.Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Nov;90(2):190-206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Jul 13. Int J Psychophysiol. 2013. PMID: 23856353 Free PMC article.
-
Olfactory and trigeminal interaction of menthol and nicotine in humans.Exp Brain Res. 2012 May;219(1):13-26. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3063-2. Epub 2012 Mar 21. Exp Brain Res. 2012. PMID: 22434343 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Sex differences in chemosensation: sensory or emotional?Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 26;7:607. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00607. eCollection 2013. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013. PMID: 24133429 Free PMC article.
-
Intensified neuronal investment in the processing of chemosensory anxiety signals in non-socially anxious and socially anxious individuals.PLoS One. 2010 Apr 23;5(4):e10342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010342. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20428249 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources