Calculation of sample size in survival trials: the impact of informative noncompliance
- PMID: 15339304
- DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00231.x
Calculation of sample size in survival trials: the impact of informative noncompliance
Abstract
Sample size calculations for survival trials typically include an adjustment to account for the expected rate of noncompliance, or discontinuation from study medication. Existing sample size methods assume that when patients discontinue, they do so independently of their risk of an endpoint; that is, that noncompliance is noninformative. However, this assumption is not always true, as we illustrate using results from a published clinical trial database. In this article, we introduce a modified version of the method proposed by Lakatos (1988, Biometrics 44, 229-241) that can be used to calculate sample size under informative noncompliance. This method is based on the concept of two subpopulations: one with high rates of endpoint and discontinuation and another with low rates. Using this new method, we show that failure to consider the impact of informative noncompliance can lead to a considerably underpowered study.
Similar articles
-
Sample size calculation in survival trials accounting for time-varying relationship between noncompliance and risk of outcome event.Clin Trials. 2006;3(4):349-59. doi: 10.1177/1740774506069155. Clin Trials. 2006. PMID: 17060209
-
The choice of sample size: a mixed Bayesian / frequentist approach.Stat Methods Med Res. 2009 Apr;18(2):183-94. doi: 10.1177/0962280208089298. Epub 2008 Apr 29. Stat Methods Med Res. 2009. PMID: 18445695
-
Test equality and sample size calculation based on risk difference in a randomized clinical trial with noncompliance and missing outcomes.Biom J. 2008 Apr;50(2):224-36. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200710388. Biom J. 2008. PMID: 18264992
-
Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 Jul;29(4):507-16. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2007.12.001. Epub 2007 Dec 23. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008. PMID: 18201944 Review.
-
Bayesian sample size calculations in phase II clinical trials using informative conjugate priors.Control Clin Trials. 2004 Apr;25(2):157-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.11.006. Control Clin Trials. 2004. PMID: 15020034 Review.
Cited by
-
Estimating treatment effects with treatment switching via semicompeting risks models: an application to a colorectal cancer study.Biometrika. 2012 Mar;99(1):167-184. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asr062. Epub 2011 Dec 29. Biometrika. 2012. PMID: 23049136 Free PMC article.
-
Cohort Multiple Randomised Controlled Trials (cmRCT) design: efficient but biased? A simulation study to evaluate the feasibility of the Cluster cmRCT design.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 26;16(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0208-1. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 27566594 Free PMC article.
-
Informative noncompliance in endpoint trials.Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2004 Jul 3;5(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1468-6708-5-5. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med. 2004. PMID: 15233844 Free PMC article.
-
Differential losses to follow-up that are outcome-dependent can vitiate a clinical trial: Simulation results.J Biopharm Stat. 2018;28(4):633-644. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2017.1372773. Epub 2017 Oct 30. J Biopharm Stat. 2018. PMID: 28858561 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of mid-term carcinologic control obtained after open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.World J Urol. 2009 Oct;27(5):599-605. doi: 10.1007/s00345-009-0379-z. Epub 2009 May 7. World J Urol. 2009. PMID: 19421755
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical