Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2005 Apr;16(4):359-71.
doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1694-2. Epub 2004 Sep 1.

Health care utilization and expenditures in the United States: a study of osteoporosis-related fractures

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Health care utilization and expenditures in the United States: a study of osteoporosis-related fractures

Lucinda Strycker Orsini et al. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Apr.

Abstract

Background: More than 1.5 million fractures occur due to osteoporosis each year. This study examines the annual health care utilization and associated expenditures of osteoporotic patients who sustain a new fragility fracture and of those without a new fracture.

Methods and procedures: The study sample from commercial claims databases consisted of patients enrolled in US plans between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2001. Patients with both an osteoporosis diagnosis and a related fracture were classified as "osteoporosis with concurrent fracture"; all other osteoporosis patients were classified as "osteoporosis without concurrent fracture." Annual utilization and expenditures for the concurrent-fracture cohort were compared with those without concurrent fracture, as well as with a group of patients without osteoporosis (controls) that was matched to the concurrent-fracture cohort based on age, gender, US region, health plan type, and length of enrollment. Exponential conditional mean models were used to compute regression-adjusted total expenditures across the groups. The differences in adjusted expenditures were used to generate the economic burden-of-illness estimates.

Results: Osteoporosis patients with concurrent fracture incurred more than twice the overall health care expenditures in the study period, compared with those without fracture (US $15,942 vs $6,476), and nearly three times those of the control group (US $15,942 vs $4,658). Approximately 25% of the overall health care expenditures (US $4,014 of $15,942) for the concurrent-fracture group were osteoporosis-related expenditures, leading to the conclusion that comorbid conditions in osteoporosis patients with concurrent fracture contribute significantly to overall health care costs. Some of these comorbidity-related costs were likely due to pain-related disorders, which occurred significantly more frequently in the concurrent-fracture cohort than in the other groups.

Conclusion: Osteoporosis-related expenditures, particularly those related to fracture, were substantial. However, non-osteoporosis-related expenditures to treat comorbid conditions constituted 75% of the overall health care costs in the year after an osteoporosis-related fracture, which warrants further investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(7):577-82 - PubMed
    1. Calcif Tissue Int. 1998 Mar;62(3):209-13 - PubMed
    1. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(6):493-500 - PubMed
    1. NIH Consens Statement. 2000 Mar 27-29;17(1):1-45 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Jun;88(6):2573-8 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources