Biomechanical properties of skin in vitro for different expansion methods
- PMID: 15342158
- DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.05.009
Biomechanical properties of skin in vitro for different expansion methods
Abstract
Objective: In plastic surgery, clinicians are interested in replacing conventional expansion by rapid expansion, because the expansion period could be shortened greatly. Also people are concerned that skin properties after rapid expansion might not approach those after conventional expansion.
Design: Biomechanical testing of skin for different expansion methods.
Background: It would be useful to know how much the mechanical properties of skin have been altered during rapid and conventional expansion and during different maintaining times.
Methods: Tensile strength, stress-strain relationship, stress relaxation, and creep were measured by a material testing machine.
Result: The biomechanical properties of experimental specimens differ significantly from those of their controls immediately after expansion, however, the difference is reduced with time. With the same maintaining period, the biomechanical properties of rapidly expanded skin are similar to conventionally expanded skin.
Conclusion: Rapid skin expansion did not demonstrate any deleterious effect when compared with the conventional expansion. Extension of the maintaining period can improve the biomechanical properties of expanded skin. Therefore, rapid expansion with an extended maintaining period is acceptable in clinical practice.
Similar articles
-
[Biomechanical properties of skin expanded by different methods in vivo].Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2003 Dec;20(4):580-2. Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi. 2003. PMID: 14716849 Chinese.
-
Biomechanical comparison between conventional and rapid expansion of skin.Br J Plast Surg. 2003 Oct;56(7):660-6. doi: 10.1016/s0007-1226(03)00217-0. Br J Plast Surg. 2003. PMID: 12969664
-
Effects of subcutaneous expansion on the mechanical properties of porcine skin.J Surg Res. 1995 Feb;58(2):117-23. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1995.1019. J Surg Res. 1995. PMID: 7861761
-
[Repair of skin defects by skin extension procedures].Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1996 Oct;41(5):563-71. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 1996. PMID: 9687611 Review. French.
-
Biomechanical properties of peripheral nerves.Hand Clin. 1996 May;12(2):195-204. Hand Clin. 1996. PMID: 8724573 Review.
Cited by
-
Chronic urogenital sinus expansion in reconstruction of high persistent cloaca.Pediatr Surg Int. 2012 Aug;28(8):835-40. doi: 10.1007/s00383-012-3114-6. Epub 2012 Jul 21. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012. PMID: 22820832
-
Power type strain energy function model and prediction of the anisotropic mechanical properties of skin using uniaxial extension data.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013 Oct;51(10):1147-56. doi: 10.1007/s11517-013-1098-6. Epub 2013 Jul 18. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013. PMID: 23864550
-
Minimal preconditioning effects observed for inflation tests of planar tissues.J Biomech Eng. 2013 Nov;135(11):114502. doi: 10.1115/1.4025105. J Biomech Eng. 2013. PMID: 23897279 Free PMC article.
-
Age-dependent biomechanical properties of the skin.Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2013 Oct;30(5):302-6. doi: 10.5114/pdia.2013.38359. Epub 2013 Oct 30. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2013. PMID: 24353490 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Incompatibility of Living Systems: Characterizing Growth-Induced Incompatibilities in Expanded Skin.Ann Biomed Eng. 2016 May;44(5):1734-52. doi: 10.1007/s10439-015-1467-4. Epub 2015 Sep 28. Ann Biomed Eng. 2016. PMID: 26416721 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources