Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 Oct;18(4):405-13.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018040-00008.

Cocaine medications, cocaine consumption and societal costs

Affiliations

Cocaine medications, cocaine consumption and societal costs

W S Cartwright. Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the benefits of reduced cocaine consumption in terms of reduced societal costs resulting from the introduction of a medication for cocaine dependence with a small incremental treatment effect.

Study design: Cost-benefit analysis is applied to study the implications of reduced cocaine consumption. A modelling approach extrapolates the magnitude of treatment effects.

Methods: Epidemiological data on cocaine use and consumption as well as economic methods of cost-benefit analysis are utilised. Estimates of societal costs associated with heavy users of cocaine, who are most likely addicted and in need of immediate treatment, are developed using 1995 data.

Main outcome measures and results: In the first analysis, a postulated 1% reduction in consumption of cocaine among heavy users is examined to approximate a small treatment effect, resulting in a minimal consumption benefit. It is estimated that such a reduction would be valued at $US259 million. The cost-benefit analysis indicated that a cocaine medication with a small treatment effect (10 percentage point increase in abstinence rates) would result in a benefit to cost ratio in the range of 1.58 to 5.79, depending on prescribing behaviour and type of patient.

Conclusions: Such estimates of the benefits of these small treatment effects are conservative, and they may be biased downwards since the willingness to pay for such a cocaine medication could far exceed the benefit to cost estimation used in this paper. Nevertheless, the substantial benefits found in this paper indicate how important investment in cocaine medication is for public health policy; costs may be reduced with efficient prescribing behaviour. Market and governmental barriers to the utilisation of a cocaine medication could reduce the benefits and increase costs. Clinical trials, cost-effectiveness studies, and cost-benefit studies must be conducted to establish the actual pattern of benefits and costs that could be obtained for an efficacious and effective cocaine medication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1994 Mar;182(3):157-63 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1996 Jan 27;347(8996):237-40 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources