Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Sep;112(13):1265-8.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.7219.

Dioxin revisited: developments since the 1997 IARC classification of dioxin as a human carcinogen

Affiliations
Review

Dioxin revisited: developments since the 1997 IARC classification of dioxin as a human carcinogen

Kyle Steenland et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Sep.

Abstract

In 1997 the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD; the most potent dioxin congener) as a group 1 carcinogen based on limited evidence in humans, sufficient evidence in experimental animals, and extensive mechanistic information indicating that TCDD acts through a mechanism involving the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), which is present in both humans and animals. The judgment of limited evidence in humans was based primarily on an elevation of all cancers combined in four industrial cohorts. The group 1 classification has been somewhat controversial and has been challenged in the literature in recent years. In this article we review the epidemiologic and mechanistic evidence that has emerged since 1997. New epidemiologic evidence consists primarily of positive exposure-response analyses in several of the industrial cohorts, as well as evidence of excesses of several specific cancers in the Seveso accident cohort. There are also new data regarding how the AhR functions in mediating the carcinogenic response to TCDD. The new evidence generally supports the 1997 IARC classification.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Akhtar F, Garabrant D, Ketchum N, Michalek J. Cancer in US Air Force veterans of the Vietnam war. J Occup Environ Med. 2004;46:123–136. - PubMed
    1. Aylward LL, Hays SM. Temporal trends in human TCDD body burden: decreases over three decades and implications for exposure levels. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2002;12:319–328. - PubMed
    1. Baccarelli A, Pesatori A, Master S, Patterson D, Needham L, Mocarelli P, et al. Aryl-hydrocarbon receptor-dependent pathway and toxic effects of TCDD in humans: a population-based study in Seveso, Italy. Toxicol Lett. 2004;149:287–293. - PubMed
    1. Becher H, Flesch-Janys D, Kauppinen T, Kogevinas M, Steindorf K, Manz A, et al. Cancer mortality in German male workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides and dioxins. Cancer Causes Control. 1996;7:312–321. - PubMed
    1. Becher H, Steindorf K, Flesch-Janys D. Quantitative cancer risk assessment for dioxins using an occupational cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 1998;106(suppl 2):663–670. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources