Waterbirths compared with landbirths: an observational study of nine years
- PMID: 15346814
- DOI: 10.1515/JPM.2004.057
Waterbirths compared with landbirths: an observational study of nine years
Abstract
Aims: This study compares neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality between waterbirths and landbirths (spontaneous singleton births in cephalic presentation, vacuum extractions are excluded).
Methods: In this observational study covering nine years, standardized questionnaires were used to document 9,518 spontaneous singleton cephalic presentation births, of which 3,617 were waterbirths and 5,901 landbirths.
Results: Landbirths show higher rates of episiotomies as well as third and fourth degree perineal lacerations. Waterbirths show a higher rate of births "without injuries", first and second-degree perineal lacerations, vaginal and labial tears. After a waterbirth, there is an average loss of 5.26 g/l blood; this is significantly less than landbirths where there is an 8.08 g/l blood loss on average. In 69.7% waterbirths required no analgesic, compared to 58.0% for landbirths. Water and landbirths do not differ with respect to maternal and neonatal infections. After landbirths, there was a higher rate of newborn complications with subsequent transfer to an external NICU. During the study, there were neither maternal nor neonatal deaths related to spontaneous labor.
Conclusions: Waterbirths are associated with low risks for both mother and child when obstetrical guidelines are followed.
Comment in
-
The baby or the bathwater: which one should be discarded?J Perinat Med. 2004;32(4):306-7. doi: 10.1515/JPM.2004.056. J Perinat Med. 2004. PMID: 15346813 No abstract available.
-
The baby and the bathwater--a comment.J Perinat Med. 2004;32(6):543-4. doi: 10.1515/JPM.20040.150. J Perinat Med. 2004. PMID: 15576281 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources