Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2000 May;11(5):313-8.
doi: 10.1023/a:1008913501297.

Theoretical relationship between maximum pore size and toughness in experimental inflammatory arthritis

Affiliations

Theoretical relationship between maximum pore size and toughness in experimental inflammatory arthritis

M W Pysklywec et al. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000 May.

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis increases the risk of fracture. In an animal model of inflammatory arthritis, femoral diaphysis had a decreased toughness as well as increased cortical porosity, when compared to normal bone. Based on the hypothesis that stress concentration from the large porous defects reduces the ability of the cortical bone to resist failure, this work determined if the changes observed in porosity could explain the changes observed in toughness. Using theoretical relationships of the stress concentration and stress states, a model of the observed conditions was considered. A relationship was developed that indicated the relative difference in toughness between normal and arthritic specimens as a function of pore size. Results indicated that the increase in cortical pore size could theoretically reduce toughness by 55%. This decrease compares with the experimentally observed drop in toughness of 61%. Furthermore, the critical parameter for fracture in this situation is the ratio of pore diameter to cortical thickness. Efforts to reduce cortical porosity seen in inflammatory arthritis would be effective in enhancing the toughness of bone and may reduce morbidity in a human population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BMJ. 1993 Feb 27;306(6877):558 - PubMed
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 1986 Feb;45(2):149-55 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1994 Jul 2;344(8914):23-7 - PubMed
    1. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1984;10(3):179-222 - PubMed
    1. J Orthop Res. 1989;7(6):828-37 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources