Effect of hydrophobicity on in vitro streptococcal adhesion to dental alloys
- PMID: 15348088
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1008913915399
Effect of hydrophobicity on in vitro streptococcal adhesion to dental alloys
Abstract
Non-specific interactions such as electrostatic interactions, and surface free energy are of importance in bacterial adhesion to dental surfaces as they determine whether or not bacteria are attracted to the surface. The relationship between adherence of Streptococcus mitis, S. mutans, S. oralis and S. sanguinis on precious and non-precious dental alloys, and the bacterial and alloy surface hydrophobicities (a measure of the surface free energy) was studied. The number of adhering bacteria was determined by fluorescence microscopy counts. The hydrophobicity of the bacteria and alloy surfaces were evaluated by adhesion to hexadecane and water contact angles, respectively. Our results showed that (i) the surfaces of the tested alloys were hydrophobic, (ii) S. sanguinis, S. mutans and S. oralis were hydrophobic, and (iii) S. mitis was hydrophilic. S. oralis, the more hydrophobic strain, demonstrated the highest adherence on the tested materials, whereas S. mitis adhered least on the hydrophobic surfaces. For the tested alloys, bacterial adherence was highest for the high gold content alloy, and lowest for the non-precious alloy. Our results showed that for the tested bacterial strains, there was a significant correlation between bacterial adhesion and substratum hydrophobicity: hydrophobic metal surfaces favor adhesion of hydrophobic bacteria.
Copyright 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the adhesion of Streptococcus sanguinis to commonly used dental alloys stratified by gold content.J Dent Sci. 2016 Dec;11(4):437-442. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Nov 9. J Dent Sci. 2016. PMID: 30895009 Free PMC article.
-
Streptococcal adherence on various restorative materials.J Dent Res. 1988 Mar;67(3):588-91. doi: 10.1177/00220345880670031301. J Dent Res. 1988. PMID: 3170897
-
In vitro streptococcal adherence on prosthetic and implant materials. Interactions with physicochemical surface properties.J Oral Rehabil. 2004 Feb;31(2):140-8. doi: 10.1046/j.0305-182x.2003.01136.x. J Oral Rehabil. 2004. PMID: 15009598
-
Bacterial Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to Dental Material Surfaces.Molecules. 2021 Feb 21;26(4):1152. doi: 10.3390/molecules26041152. Molecules. 2021. PMID: 33670043 Free PMC article.
-
Surface free energy and bacterial retention to saliva-coated dental implant materials--an in vitro study.Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2004 Dec 25;39(4):199-205. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2004.08.002. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2004. PMID: 15555904
Cited by
-
Effect of micro- and nanoscale topography on the adhesion of bacterial cells to solid surfaces.Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Apr;79(8):2703-12. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03436-12. Epub 2013 Feb 15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 23416997 Free PMC article.
-
Binding forces of Streptococcus mutans P1 adhesin.ACS Nano. 2015 Feb 24;9(2):1448-60. doi: 10.1021/nn5058886. Epub 2015 Feb 11. ACS Nano. 2015. PMID: 25671413 Free PMC article.
-
Lipids in preventive dentistry.Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):669-85. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0835-9. Epub 2012 Sep 28. Clin Oral Investig. 2013. PMID: 23053698 Review.
-
Mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in plaque on a leucite-reinforced dental ceramic and on a calcium aluminate cement.Clin Oral Investig. 2006 Sep;10(3):175-80. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0045-4. Epub 2006 Apr 28. Clin Oral Investig. 2006. PMID: 16642391
-
Decontamination Effect of the Spindle and 222-Nanometer Krypton-Chlorine Excimer Lamp Combination against Pathogens on Apples (Malus domestica Borkh.) and Bell Peppers (Capsicum annuum L.).Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 May 30;85(12):e00006-19. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00006-19. Print 2019 Jun 15. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019. PMID: 30952663 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources