Evaluation of the acute scarring response to the implant of different types of biomaterial in the abdominal wall
- PMID: 15348095
- DOI: 10.1023/a:1008981517743
Evaluation of the acute scarring response to the implant of different types of biomaterial in the abdominal wall
Abstract
Since the short-term, acute scarring process induced by a biomaterial may condition the evolution of the repair process, the present investigation evaluates the behavior of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and polypropylene (PL) biomaterials in the initial stages of repair. Three PTFE biomaterials (Mycro Mesh, Dual Mesh and Soft Tissue Patch) and one PL biomaterial (Marlex) were employed to repair defects created in the abdominal wall of New Zealand rabbits. Animals were sacrificed at 3 or 7 days. Specimens were obtained for light and scanning electron microscopy, and immunohistochemical analysis using the RAM-11 monoclonal antibody for rabbit macrophages. The PL implants showed substantial adhesion formation with viscera. Lower adhesion formation was detected in the PTFE implants. The evolution of the acute phase of the repair process was similar for each PTFE biomaterial. At 3 days post implant, an incipient neoperitoneum was detected which was fully established after 7 days. The behavior of the PL implant was similar, although a greater amount of reticular granulation was detected. The neoformed peritoneum was irregular. Few RAM-11-labeled macrophages were detected in all cases. The acute phase of the tissue repair process induced by the implant of PTFE and PL biomaterials generally proceeds along similar lines to a normal repair process. However, the use of microporous, laminar materials seems to favor the early establishment of a well-defined neoperitoneal layer.
Copyright 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers
Similar articles
-
The behavior of different types of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) prostheses in the reparative scarring process of abdominal wall defects.Histol Histopathol. 1997 Jul;12(3):683-90. Histol Histopathol. 1997. PMID: 9225151
-
Effect of relaparotomy through previously integrated polypropylene and polytetrafluoroethylene experimental implants in the abdominal wall.J Am Coll Surg. 1999 May;188(5):466-72. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00029-0. J Am Coll Surg. 1999. PMID: 10235573
-
Comparison of a new type of polytetrafluoroethylene patch (Mycro Mesh) and polypropylene prosthesis (Marlex) for repair of abdominal wall defects.J Am Coll Surg. 1996 Jul;183(1):11-8. J Am Coll Surg. 1996. PMID: 8673302
-
* The New Zealand White Rabbit as a Model for Preclinical Studies Addressing Tissue Repair at the Level of the Abdominal Wall.Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017 Dec;23(12):863-880. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEC.2017.0167. Epub 2017 Oct 27. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017. PMID: 28756748 Review.
-
[Biomaterials and hernia surgery. Rationale for using them].Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1995 Aug;87(8):582-6. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 1995. PMID: 7577108 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Shish-kebab structure fiber with nano and micro diameter regulate macrophage polarization for anti-inflammatory and bone differentiation.Mater Today Bio. 2023 Nov 28;23:100880. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100880. eCollection 2023 Dec. Mater Today Bio. 2023. PMID: 38149017 Free PMC article.
-
Biodegradable hyaluronan hydrogel coatings on acellular dermis grafts-A potential strategy to improve biologic graft durability in hernia repair application.J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Nov;107(8):2664-2672. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34357. Epub 2019 Mar 12. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019. PMID: 30860665 Free PMC article.
-
In vitro mesothelialization of prosthetic materials designed for the repair of abdominal wall defects.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003 Apr;14(4):359-64. doi: 10.1023/a:1022936016618. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2003. PMID: 15348460
-
Evaluation of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene mesh placed intraperitoneally in a New Zealand white rabbit model.Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1884-91. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2120-4. Epub 2012 Jan 5. Surg Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22219009
-
Postimplantation host tissue response and biodegradation of biologic versus polymer meshes implanted in an intraperitoneal position.Surg Endosc. 2014 Feb;28(2):559-69. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3205-z. Epub 2013 Sep 18. Surg Endosc. 2014. PMID: 24045862
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources