Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli
- PMID: 15351630
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.022
Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli
Abstract
To delineate the time course and processing stages of pitch encoding at the level of the supratemporal plane, the present study recorded evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise (RN) stimuli. RN largely masks simple tonotopic representations and addresses pitch processing within the temporal domain (periodicity encoding). Four dichotic stimulus types (111 or 133 Hz RN at one ear, white noise to the other one) were applied in randomized order during either visual distraction or selective auditory attention. Strictly periodic signals, noise-like events, and mixtures of both signals served as control conditions. (1) Attention-dependent ear x hemisphere interactions were observed within the time domain of the M50 field, indicating early streaming of auditory information. (2) M100 responses to strictly periodic stimuli were found lateralized to the right hemisphere. Furthermore, the higher-pitched stimuli yielded enhanced activation as compared to the lower-pitch signals (pitch scaling), conceivably reflecting sensory memory operations. (3) Besides right-hemisphere pitch scaling, the relatively late M100 component in association with the RN condition (latency = 136 ms) showed significantly stronger field strengths over the left hemisphere. Control experiments revealed this lateralization effect to be related to noise rather than pitch processing. Furthermore, subtle noise variations interacted with signal periodicity. Obviously, thus, complex task demands such as RN encoding give rise to functional segregation of auditory processing across the two hemispheres (left hemisphere: noise, right hemisphere: periodicity representation). The observed noise/periodicity interactions, furthermore, might reflect pitch-synchronous spectral evaluation at the level of the left supratemporal plane, triggered by right-hemisphere representation of signal periodicity.
Copyright 2004 Elsevier Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Neuromagnetic responses associated with perceptual segregation of pitch.Neurol Clin Neurophysiol. 2004 Nov 30;2004:33. Neurol Clin Neurophysiol. 2004. PMID: 16012630
-
Processing of binaural spatial information in human auditory cortex: neuromagnetic responses to interaural timing and level differences.Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2610-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 May 11. Neuropsychologia. 2010. PMID: 20466010
-
Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses.Cereb Cortex. 2005 Dec;15(12):2029-39. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi078. Epub 2005 Mar 16. Cereb Cortex. 2005. PMID: 15772375
-
Long-latency auditory evoked magnetic fields.Adv Neurol. 1990;54:177-91. Adv Neurol. 1990. PMID: 2270803 Review. No abstract available.
-
Pitch coding and pitch processing in the human brain.Hear Res. 2014 Jan;307:53-64. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.07.020. Epub 2013 Aug 11. Hear Res. 2014. PMID: 23938209 Review.
Cited by
-
Age-related differences in neuromagnetic brain activity underlying concurrent sound perception.J Neurosci. 2007 Feb 7;27(6):1308-14. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5433-06.2007. J Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17287505 Free PMC article.
-
Generators of the intracranial P50 response in auditory sensory gating.Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 1;35(2):814-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.011. Epub 2006 Dec 19. Neuroimage. 2007. PMID: 17293126 Free PMC article.
-
Auditory priming of frequency and temporal information: effects of lateralised presentation.Laterality. 2007 Nov;12(6):507-35. doi: 10.1080/13576500701566727. Laterality. 2007. PMID: 17852702 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical