Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Sep;54(506):667-72.

Giving patients an audiotape of their GP consultation: a randomised controlled trial

Christine Liddell  1 , Gordon Rae, Tom R M Brown, David Johnston, Vivien Coates, John Mallett
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Giving patients an audiotape of their GP consultation: a randomised controlled trial

Christine Liddell et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Providing patients with an audiotape of their medical consultation has been a relatively common practice in oncology clinics for some years. However, broader generalisability of the technique has yet to be examined.

Aims: To investigate the efficacy of providing patients with an audiotape of their consultation in a general practice setting.

Design of study: Randomised controlled trial: 95 experimental participants, 85 controls.

Setting: Routine surgeries run by two general practitioners (GPs) in two different health centres.

Method: All patients attending GP appointments were eligible for inclusion. Patients were followed up by telephone 7-10 days later.

Results: More than half (61%) of the patients who received a tape listened to it. Among listeners, 64% rated the tape useful or very useful; 24% noticed information not heard in the consultation. Half of listeners (46%) said that their understanding of the consultation improved after listening to the tape. Half of the listeners (48%) shared the tape with others, of whom 71% found sharing helpful or very helpful. However, 21% of those who shared the information with others found this unhelpful or very unhelpful, suggesting that patients may need to be briefed on the potential risks of sharing. At follow-up a week later, it emerged that being given a tape had no effect on adherence with GPs' advice, nor on anxiety about conditions.

Conclusion: Providing patients with an audiotape of their GP consultation was positively rated by many patients. Although there were no detectable clinical effects at follow-up, the technique merits further evaluation in general practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Details of sample.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Butt HR. A method for better physician — patient communication. Ann Intern Med. 1977;86:478–480. - PubMed
    1. Bruera E, Pituskin E, Calder K, et al. The addition of an audiocassette recording of a consultation to written recommendations for patients with advanced cancer. Cancer. 1999;86:2420–2425. - PubMed
    1. Ah-Fat FG, Sharma MC, Damato BE. Taping outpatient consultations: a survey of attitudes and responses of adult patients with ocular malignancy. Eye. 1998;12:789–791. - PubMed
    1. Thomas R, Daly M, Perryman B, Stockton D. Forewarned is forearmed — benefits of preparatory information on video cassette for patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy — a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer. 2000;356:1536–1543. - PubMed
    1. Schapira MM, Meade C, Nattinger AB. Enhanced decision-making: the use of a videotape decision-aid for patients with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:119–127. - PubMed

Publication types