Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2004 Sep 7;141(5):352-9.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-5-200409070-00009.

Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy

Affiliations
Free article
Multicenter Study

Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy

Perry J Pickhardt et al. Ann Intern Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Previous estimates of the adenoma miss rate with optical colonoscopy (OC) are hindered by the use of OC as its own reference standard.

Objective: To evaluate the frequency and characteristics of colorectal neoplasms that are missed prospectively on OC by using virtual colonoscopy (VC) as a separate reference standard.

Design: Prospective, multicenter screening trial.

Setting: 3 medical centers.

Participants: 1233 asymptomatic adults who underwent same-day VC and OC.

Measurements: Colorectal neoplasms (adenomatous polyps) missed at OC before VC results were unblinded.

Results: Fourteen (93.3%) of 15 nonrectal neoplasms were located on a fold; 10 (71.4%) of these were located on the backside of a fold. Five (83.3%) of 6 rectal lesions were located within 10 cm of the anal verge.

Limitations: Estimation of the OC miss rate depended on polyp detection on both VC and second-look OC and therefore underestimates the true OC miss rate, particularly for smaller polyps.

Conclusions: Most clinically significant adenomas missed prospectively on OC are located behind a fold or near the anal verge. The 12% OC miss rate for large adenomas (>or=10 mm) when state-of-the-art 3-dimensional VC is used as a separate reference standard is increased from the previous 0% to 6% estimates derived by using OC as its own reference standard.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types