Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Jun;17(3):191-7.
doi: 10.1023/B:THRO.0000040488.26414.9e.

Myocardial salvage after reduced-dose thrombolysis combined with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade versus thrombolysis alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Myocardial salvage after reduced-dose thrombolysis combined with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade versus thrombolysis alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Gjin Ndrepepa et al. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2004 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The aim of study was to examine the efficacy of reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab versus alteplase alone by quantifying the amount of myocardium salvaged using myocardial scintigraphy.

Methods: This study analyzed 150 patients with acute myocardial infarction who received alteplase (69 patients) or reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab (81 patients) in the setting of the Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (STOPAMI) 1 and 2 trials. Salvage index (proportion of initial perfusion defect salvaged by reperfusion therapy), which was obtained by paired scintigraphic studies performed 7-14 days apart, was the primary endpoint of the study. One-year clinical follow-up was also done.

Results: Salvage index did not differ significantly among patients treated with reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab (median, 0.41 [25th; 75th percentiles: 0.13; 0.58]) compared to patients who received alteplase (0.26 [0.09; 0.61], p = 0.30). Final infarct size was 16.0% [4.0; 31.0] of the left ventricle in the group with reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab and 19.4% [7.9; 34.2] of left ventricle in the group with alteplase (p = 0.44). Within a time-to-admission interval of <2 hours, there was a trend for higher values of salvage index in patients who received reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab compared with patients who received alteplase (0.55 [0.35; 0.73] versus 0.29 [0.11; 0.69], p = 0.15). For time-to-admission intervals > or = 2 hours, no such trend was observed between those who received reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab or alteplase (0.25 [0.08; 0.48] versus 0.22 [0.08; 0.46], p = 0.79). Major bleeding occurred in 4 patients (5.0%) in the group with reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab versus 2 patients (3.0%) in the group with alteplase alone (p = 0.58).

Conclusion: When used as a general strategy in patients with acute myocardial infarction, adding abciximab to alteplase does not increase significantly the amount of salvaged myocardium as compared with alteplase alone. Combination therapy may offer advantages over thrombolytic agents alone if such therapy is applied within 2 hours from symptom onset; however these data need to be proven by studies of adequate power.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Circulation. 2000 Jan 25;101(3):239-43 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Nov 25;329(22):1615-22 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Dec;32(7):2003-10 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 2001 Jun 16;357(9272):1905-14 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1987 Jul;76(1):142-54 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources