Bedrails: restraints or enablers?
- PMID: 15356369
Bedrails: restraints or enablers?
Abstract
Bedrails presently are used as both mobility restraints and enablers in long-term care facilities. As enablers, bedrails facilitate movement and may reduce the risk of pressure ulcer development. As restraints, they impede movement and may increase risk of ulcer development. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act regulations on restraint use have led to confusion for state Medicare surveyors and facilities regarding the definition of appropriate bedrail use and need for supportive documentation. Consequently, some facilities receive deficiency citations for inappropriate use or documentation while others do not. The purpose of this survey was to compare responses of Directors of Nursing in long-term care facilities and Medicare state surveyors to determine how each interprets the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act bedrail language for use and documentation. Questionnaires on bedrail use and documentation were sent to state surveyors and Directors of Nursing. One hundred, three (103) Directors of Nursing in 45 states and 65 surveyors from 39 states participated in the survey (response rate 61%). Study results demonstrated general acceptance of bedrail use as an enabler but not as a restraint by both Directors of Nursing and state surveyors. Four percent (4%) of Directors of Nursing reported receiving a citation for bedrail use and 59% of surveyors reported issuing citations for bedrail use. Significant differences were noted between the two groups regarding appropriate bedrail use and necessary documentation. The intent of Medicare guidelines and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is to standardize care for nursing home residents in the United States; yet, current regulations are open to individual interpretation by state surveyors and confusion exists between the intent of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act and the daily operations of nursing homes. Educating clinicians about the risks and benefits of bedrail use, either as restraint or enabler, and developing interventions and policies for appropriate use would be an important first step in resolving this issue.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence and predictors of bedrail use in an acute hospital.Age Ageing. 2014 Nov;43(6):801-5. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu081. Epub 2014 Jul 10. Age Ageing. 2014. PMID: 25012158
-
Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 and its implications for the medical director.Clin Geriatr Med. 1995 Aug;11(3):419-32. Clin Geriatr Med. 1995. PMID: 7585388 Review.
-
Evaluation of nationally mandated drug use reviews to improve patient safety in nursing homes: a natural experiment.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jun;53(6):991-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53314.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005. PMID: 15935022
-
Nursing home reform: its legislative history and economic impact upon nursing homes.Benefits Q. 1993;9(1):19-28. Benefits Q. 1993. PMID: 10123801
-
What do surveyors need to track outcomes and compliance?Adv Wound Care. 1997 Sep;10(5):44-6. Adv Wound Care. 1997. PMID: 9362579 Review.
Cited by
-
Between Restrictive and Supportive Devices in the Context of Physical Restraints: Findings from a Large Mixed-Method Study Design.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 3;18(23):12764. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312764. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34886489 Free PMC article.
-
The need for uniform quality reporting across post-acute care rehabilitation settings: an examination of accidental falls.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Jan;63(1):195-7. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13221. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015. PMID: 25597580 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials