Asymmetry between horizontal and vertical illusory lines in determining the depth of their embedded surface
- PMID: 15358077
- DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.05.021
Asymmetry between horizontal and vertical illusory lines in determining the depth of their embedded surface
Abstract
To investigate how the visual system integrates disparity information from horizontal and vertical edges and conveys it to the regions without any depth cues, we introduce a new phenomenon of subjective surface formation in an Ehrenstein-style configuration with inducing elements at different depths, and without explicit monocular occlusion zones. Different sets of experiments by separate groups of subjects suggest that when a subjective (illusory) square forms, it is at the depth of vertical illusory sides rather than horizontal ones. When the vertical side inducers are stereoscopically behind the horizontal ones, subjective surface formation is less likely. In depth assignment, we interpret the dominance of vertical sides over horizontal ones geometrically: vertical orientation can convey the horizontal disparity--a critical factor for Wheatstone (classic) stereopsis--but horizontal orientation per se lacks horizontal disparity information. Therefore, in the disparity integration, vertical illusory sides play a dominant role and their depth information influences the embedded subjective surface as well as the horizontal illusory sides.
Copyright 2004 Elsevier Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Illusory depth perception of oblique lines produced by overlaid vertical disparity.Vision Res. 2005 Mar;45(7):931-42. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.10.008. Vision Res. 2005. PMID: 15644231
-
Pictorial cues constrain depth in da Vinci stereopsis.Vision Res. 2006 Jan;46(1-2):91-105. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.024. Epub 2005 Nov 3. Vision Res. 2006. PMID: 16271743
-
Quantitative perceived depth from sequential monocular decamouflage.Vision Res. 2006 Mar;46(5):605-13. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.06.015. Epub 2005 Jul 27. Vision Res. 2006. PMID: 16054190
-
The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception.Vision Res. 2009 Nov;49(22):2666-85. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.021. Epub 2009 Jul 3. Vision Res. 2009. PMID: 19577589 Review.
-
How does binocular rivalry emerge from cortical mechanisms of 3-D vision?Vision Res. 2008 Sep;48(21):2232-50. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.024. Epub 2008 Aug 13. Vision Res. 2008. PMID: 18640145 Review.
Cited by
-
Cortical Dynamics of Figure-Ground Separation in Response to 2D Pictures and 3D Scenes: How V2 Combines Border Ownership, Stereoscopic Cues, and Gestalt Grouping Rules.Front Psychol. 2016 Jan 26;6:2054. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02054. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2016. PMID: 26858665 Free PMC article.
-
Perception of rigidity in three- and four-dimensional spaces.Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 17;14:1180561. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1180561. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37663341 Free PMC article.
-
How the venetian blind percept emerges from the laminar cortical dynamics of 3D vision.Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 5;5:694. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00694. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 25309467 Free PMC article.
-
The resonant brain: How attentive conscious seeing regulates action sequences that interact with attentive cognitive learning, recognition, and prediction.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2237-2264. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01789-2. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019. PMID: 31218601 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources