HealthConnect and privacy: a policy conundrum
- PMID: 15359552
HealthConnect and privacy: a policy conundrum
Abstract
A shared electronic health record is intrinsically privacy-invasive because it creates a comprehensive record for information-sharing. The author explains the significance of information privacy and why it is that health information warrants special protection. She also provides an overview of the existing regulatory framework and an evaluation of suggested options and proposals for addressing privacy-related issues. Her analysis of suggested consent models suggests that they ultimately involve a trade-off between privacy and the broader benefits promised by HealthConnect and that obtaining the right balance is essential if HealthConnect is to achieve optimal health outcomes.
Similar articles
-
HealthConnect and the duty of care: a dilemma for medical practitioners.J Law Med. 2004 Aug;12(1):69-79. J Law Med. 2004. PMID: 15359551
-
Consenting to shared electronic health records: the proposed HealthConnect system.J Law Med. 2004 Feb;11(3):269-73. J Law Med. 2004. PMID: 15018203 Review. No abstract available.
-
Trustworthy shared electronic health records: recordkeeping requirements and HealthConnect.J Law Med. 2004 Aug;12(1):40-59. J Law Med. 2004. PMID: 15359549
-
Privacy and confidentiality practices for research with health information in Canada.J Law Med Ethics. 1997 Summer-Fall;25(2-3):130-8, 82. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1997.tb01888.x. J Law Med Ethics. 1997. PMID: 11066487 Review.
-
Ethical issues in HealthConnect's shared electronic health record system.J Law Med. 2004 Aug;12(1):60-8. J Law Med. 2004. PMID: 15359550