Modeling guidelines for integration into clinical workflow
- PMID: 15360798
Modeling guidelines for integration into clinical workflow
Abstract
The success of clinical decision-support systems requires that they are seamlessly integrated into clinical workflow. In the SAGE project, which aims to create the technological infra-structure for implementing computable clinical practice guide-lines in enterprise settings, we created a deployment-driven methodology for developing guideline knowledge bases. It involves (1) identification of usage scenarios of guideline-based care in clinical workflow, (2) distillation and disambiguation of guideline knowledge relevant to these usage scenarios, (3) formalization of data elements and vocabulary used in the guideline, and (4) encoding of usage scenarios and guideline knowledge using an executable guideline model. This methodology makes explicit the points in the care process where guideline-based decision aids are appropriate and the roles of clinicians for whom the guideline-based assistance is intended. We have evaluated the methodology by simulating the deployment of an immunization guideline in a real clinical information system and by reconstructing the workflow context of a deployed decision-support system for guideline-based care. We discuss the implication of deployment-driven guideline encoding for sharability of executable guidelines.
Similar articles
-
Executing clinical practice guidelines using the SAGE execution engine.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 1):251-5. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004. PMID: 15360813
-
Achieving reuse of computable guideline systems.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):99-103. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001. PMID: 11604714
-
Creating interoperable guidelines: requirements of vocabulary standards in immunization decision support.Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(Pt 2):930-4. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007. PMID: 17911852
-
Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support.Artif Intell Med. 2004 May;31(1):1-27. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2004.02.003. Artif Intell Med. 2004. PMID: 15182844 Review.
-
Computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. Where are we and where are we going ?Yearb Med Inform. 2006:145-58. Yearb Med Inform. 2006. PMID: 17051309 Review.
Cited by
-
Formative evaluation of the accuracy of a clinical decision support system for cervical cancer screening.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug;20(4):749-57. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001613. Epub 2013 Apr 5. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013. PMID: 23564631 Free PMC article.
-
Biomedical informatics and outcomes research: enabling knowledge-driven health care.Circulation. 2009 Dec 8;120(23):2393-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.795526. Circulation. 2009. PMID: 19996023 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Structuring order sets for interoperable distribution.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006;2006:549-53. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006. PMID: 17238401 Free PMC article.
-
Reduction in Clinical Variance Using Targeted Design Changes in Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Order Sets: Impact on Hospitalized Children with Acute Asthma Exacerbation.Appl Clin Inform. 2012 Feb 8;3(1):52-63. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2011-01-RA-0002. Print 2012. Appl Clin Inform. 2012. PMID: 23616900 Free PMC article.
-
Design, implementation, use, and preliminary evaluation of SEBASTIAN, a standards-based Web service for clinical decision support.AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:380-4. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005. PMID: 16779066 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical