User acceptance of clinical information systems: a methodological approach to identify the key dimensions allowing a reliable evaluation framework
- PMID: 15360970
User acceptance of clinical information systems: a methodological approach to identify the key dimensions allowing a reliable evaluation framework
Abstract
The introduction of Computerized Information Systems (CIS) in clinical settings encountered difficulties. These difficulties highlight the lack of understanding of factors and mechanisms influencing user acceptance. The existing tools and research obtained contradictory results that point out the existence of neglected aspects, such as impacts of CIS, in computer science developments in complex settings. This paper proposes to identify key dimensions which make up user acceptance in clinical settings through the union of three methods. They define five main dimensions which require a concrete evaluation to validate the underlying proposed framework and to complete the description of the acceptance phenomenon. Identifying key dimensions opens the gate to comparative evaluation of many CIS and adds new indicators to evaluate the highlighted dimensions. A long-term aim is the development of longitudinal studies and to state priorities and guidelines for new CIS designs.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating user interactions with clinical information systems: a model based on human-computer interaction models.J Biomed Inform. 2005 Jun;38(3):244-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.12.004. Epub 2005 Jan 13. J Biomed Inform. 2005. PMID: 15896698
-
A framework for the design of user-centred teleconsulting systems.J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(1):32-9. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2008.080601. J Telemed Telecare. 2009. PMID: 19139218
-
An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit).Int J Med Inform. 2008 Jun;77(6):386-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.011. Epub 2007 Oct 26. Int J Med Inform. 2008. PMID: 17964851
-
Investigating evaluation frameworks for health information systems.Int J Med Inform. 2008 Jun;77(6):377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.004. Epub 2007 Sep 29. Int J Med Inform. 2008. PMID: 17904898 Review.
-
Outcomes assessment of clinical information system implementation: a practical guide.Nurs Outlook. 2007 Nov-Dec;55(6):282-288. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2007.09.003. Nurs Outlook. 2007. PMID: 18061012 Review.
Cited by
-
Frameworks for Implementation, Uptake, and Use of Cardiometabolic Disease-Related Digital Health Interventions in Ethnic Minority Populations: Scoping Review.JMIR Cardio. 2022 Aug 11;6(2):e37360. doi: 10.2196/37360. JMIR Cardio. 2022. PMID: 35969455 Free PMC article.
-
Physicians' beliefs about using EMR and CPOE: in pursuit of a contextualized understanding of health IT use behavior.Int J Med Inform. 2010 Feb;79(2):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.12.003. Epub 2010 Jan 13. Int J Med Inform. 2010. PMID: 20071219 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources