Lack of clopidogrel pretreatment effect on the relative efficacy of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared to heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: a REPLACE-2 substudy
- PMID: 15364319
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.049
Lack of clopidogrel pretreatment effect on the relative efficacy of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared to heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: a REPLACE-2 substudy
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess if clopidogrel pretreatment affects the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).
Background: Although thienopyridine pretreatment may improve clinical outcomes with PCI, it is unknown if bivalirudin's efficacy compared with heparin is dependent upon such pretreatment.
Methods: The Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous coronary intervention Linking Angiomax to reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE-2) trial was a double-blind, triple-dummy, randomized-controlled trial comparing heparin plus routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade (heparin group) with bivalirudin plus provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade (bivalirudin group) during PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent revascularization at 30 days, and major in-hospital bleeding. The secondary end point was a 30-day composite of death, MI, and urgent revascularization. Clopidogrel pretreatment was encouraged (300 mg loading, 75 mg/day).
Results: Of 6,010 patients enrolled, 5,893 received clopidogrel, with 85.8% in the bivalirudin and 84.6% in the heparin group receiving clopidogrel pretreatment. Bivalirudin (provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade 7.2%) was noninferior to the heparin group for both primary and secondary end points. Clopidogrel pretreatment did not affect the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with GP IIb/IIIa blockade, irrespective of pretreatment duration. Pretreatment was associated with significantly lower primary end point with bivalirudin (8.7% pretreatment vs. 12.9% no pretreatment, p = 0.007), and nonsignificantly with heparin (9.7% vs. 11.7%, respectively, p = 0.20). Multivariable models showed a trend toward lower primary and secondary end points with clopidogrel pretreatment.
Conclusions: Clopidogrel pretreatment at the doses and time administered in this trial did not influence the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa blockade for PCI. However, pretreatment was associated with a trend towards lower clinical events after PCI.
Similar articles
-
Bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention: REPLACE-2 randomized trial.JAMA. 2003 Feb 19;289(7):853-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.7.853. JAMA. 2003. PMID: 12588269 Clinical Trial.
-
Long-term efficacy of bivalirudin and provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade vs heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary revascularization: REPLACE-2 randomized trial.JAMA. 2004 Aug 11;292(6):696-703. doi: 10.1001/jama.292.6.696. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 15304466 Clinical Trial.
-
Economic evaluation of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition versus heparin with routine glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition for percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the REPLACE-2 trial.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Nov 2;44(9):1792-800. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.05.085. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004. PMID: 15519009 Clinical Trial.
-
Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Am J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15;114(2):250-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.033. Epub 2014 May 2. Am J Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24890986 Review.
-
Can bivalirudin and provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade REPLACE heparin and planned glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade during percutaneous coronary intervention?Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003 Aug;4(8):1431-3. doi: 10.1517/14656566.4.8.1431. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003. PMID: 12877649 Review.
Cited by
-
Bivalirudin: a review of its use in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.Drugs. 2005;65(13):1869-91. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565130-00010. Drugs. 2005. PMID: 16114983 Review.
-
Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 28;2(2):CD008834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008834.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35224730 Free PMC article.
-
Oral antiplatelet therapy in diabetes mellitus and the role of prasugrel: an overview.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7:445-59. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S4746. Epub 2011 Jul 18. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011. PMID: 21822392 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bivalirudin in percutaneous coronary intervention.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2(4):357-63. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.4.357. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006. PMID: 17323589 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Benefits and risks of P2Y12 inhibitor preloading in patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable angina.J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017 Oct;44(3):303-315. doi: 10.1007/s11239-017-1529-6. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017. PMID: 28730406 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous