Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Sep;126(3):959-65.
doi: 10.1378/chest.126.3.959.

Endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath increases the ability to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions endoscopically

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath increases the ability to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions endoscopically

Noriaki Kurimoto et al. Chest. 2004 Sep.

Abstract

Study objective: To assess the ability of endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) using a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions.

Method: We devised a technique for EBUS-GS covering a miniature probe, and 150 lesions were evaluated in a prospective open study. In this procedure, the probe covered by a guide sheath is introduced into the lesion via the working channel of a bronchoscope. The probe is withdrawn, while the guide sheath is left in situ. A brush or biopsy forceps is introduced through the guide sheath into the lesion.

Results: One hundred sixteen of 150 EBUS-GS procedures (77%) were diagnostic. Cases in which the probe was located within the lesion had a significantly higher diagnostic yield (105 of 121 cases, 87%) than when the probe was located adjacent to it (8 of 19 cases, 42%) [p < 0.0001, chi(2)]. The diagnostic yield from EBUS-GS in lesions </= 10 mm (16 of 21 lesions, 76%), >10 to </= 15 mm (19 of 25 lesions, 76%; p = 0.99, chi(2)), >15 to </= 20 mm (23 of 35 lesions, 66%; p = 0.41, chi(2)), and > 20 to </= 30 mm (33 of 43 lesions, 77%; p = 0.96, chi(2)) were similar, demonstrating the efficacy of EBUS-GS even in lesions </= 10 mm in diameter. In 54 of 81 lesions </= 20 mm, fluoroscopy was not able to confirm whether the forceps reached the lesion. However, the yield was the same with (67%, 18 of 27 lesions) and without (74%, 40 of 54 lesions) successful fluoroscopy (p = 0.96, chi(2)). Moderate bleeding occurred in two patients (1%); there were no other complications.

Conclusions: EBUS-GS is a useful method for collecting samples from peripheral pulmonary lesions, even those too small to be visualized under fluoroscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms