Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Oct;58(10):837-40.
doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.017509.

Evaluation of the health effects of a neighbourhood traffic calming scheme

Affiliations

Evaluation of the health effects of a neighbourhood traffic calming scheme

David S Morrison et al. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Study objective: To assess the secondary health impacts of a traffic calming scheme on a community.

Methods: Prospective cohort study of a randomly selected sample of the local community using postal questionnaires and pedestrian counts on the affected road six months before and six months after the implementation of the scheme. The setting was a community in which a traffic calming scheme was built in the main road (2587 households). The Short Form 36 version 2 was included in the questionnaire and summary measures of physical health (physical component summary) and mental health (mental component summary) calculated. A random sample of 750 households was initially posted the pre-intervention questionnaire.

Main results: There were increases in observed pedestrian activity in the area after the introduction of the traffic calming scheme. Physical health improved significantly but mental health did not change. Traffic related problems improved, while other local nuisances were reported to be worse.

Conclusions: The introduction of a traffic calming scheme is associated with improvements in health and health related behaviours. It is feasible to prospectively evaluate broader health impacts of similar transport interventions although poor response rates may limit the validity of results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Public Health. 2000 Jun;90(6):988 - PubMed
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Feb;55(2):111-22 - PubMed
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Jan;53(1):46-50 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 2001 Nov 17;323(7322):1177-82 - PubMed
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 May;57(5):327-33 - PubMed

Publication types