Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: osteogenic potential of resident bone
- PMID: 15367186
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.2004.00575.x
Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: osteogenic potential of resident bone
Abstract
Objectives: There is a limited understanding of the role of resident bone in periodontal regeneration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the resident alveolar bone on bone regeneration in conjunction with guided tissue regeneration (GTR) in the presence or the absence of cell occlusivity.
Methods: Critical-size, 6-mm, supra-alveolar periodontal defects were created in six young adult Beagle dogs. Space-providing, occlusive or porous expanded polytetrafluaroethylene devices were implanted to provide for GTR. Treatments were alternated between left and right jaw quadrants in subsequent animals. The gingival flaps were advanced for primary intention healing. The animals were euthanized at week 8 postsurgery. The histometric analysis assessed regeneration of alveolar bone relative to space-provision by the GTR device and width of the alveolar crest at the base of the defect.
Results: There were no significant differences in mean alveolar regeneration between sites receiving the porous GTR device with a narrow versus a wide alveolar ridge after adjusting for wound area (2.22 versus 2.50 mm, respectively; p=0.36). In contrast, analysis using sites receiving the occlusive GTR device revealed significantly greater bone regeneration at sites with a wide compared with a narrow alveolar ridge (3.34 versus 2.53 mm, respectively; p=0.02). Regression analysis showed a significant relationship (p< or =0.05) between space-provision and bone regeneration for all groups except for sites with a wide alveolar ridge receiving the occlusive GTR device (p=0.5).
Conclusions: The resident alveolar bone may significantly influence the magnitude of alveolar bone regeneration. The relative presence of cells from the gingival connective tissue may attenuate this effect.
Copyright Blackwell Munksgaard, 2004
Similar articles
-
Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: effect of tissue occlusion on alveolar bone regeneration with guided tissue regeneration.J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Sep;31(9):730-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00543.x. J Clin Periodontol. 2004. PMID: 15312094
-
Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: bone formation at teeth and titanium implants.J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Nov;31(11):927-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00590.x. J Clin Periodontol. 2004. PMID: 15491305
-
Prognostic factors for alveolar regeneration: effect of space provision.J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Sep;32(9):951-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00763.x. J Clin Periodontol. 2005. PMID: 16104958
-
The role of guided tissue regeneration and guided bone regeneration.Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 1994 Apr;12:80-8. Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg. 1994. PMID: 7993064 Review.
-
Overview of effects of electrical stimulation on osteogenesis and alveolar bone.J Periodontol. 1995 Jan;66(1):2-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.1.2. J Periodontol. 1995. PMID: 7891245 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of a topical herbal patch for soft tissue wound healing: an animal study.J Clin Periodontol. 2015 Mar;42(3):288-93. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12372. Epub 2015 Mar 9. J Clin Periodontol. 2015. PMID: 25640329 Free PMC article.
-
Stem cells: Sources, and regenerative therapies in dental research and practice.World J Stem Cells. 2015 Aug 26;7(7):1047-53. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i7.1047. World J Stem Cells. 2015. PMID: 26328020 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Influence of Autologus Adipose Derived Stem Cells and PRP on Regeneration of Dehiscence-Type Defects in Alveolar Bone: A Comparative Histochemical and Histomorphometric Study in Dogs.Int J Stem Cells. 2011 Jun;4(1):61-9. doi: 10.15283/ijsc.2011.4.1.61. Int J Stem Cells. 2011. PMID: 24298335 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources