Cost-effectiveness of interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate in newly diagnosed non-primary progressive multiple sclerosis
- PMID: 15367251
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2004.75007.x
Cost-effectiveness of interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate in newly diagnosed non-primary progressive multiple sclerosis
Abstract
Objective: To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of three immunomodulatory treatments for newly diagnosed nonprimary progressive MS: interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, and glatiramer acetate.
Methods: We developed a state-transition model to estimate the health effects and costs associated with interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, glatiramer acetate, and no treatment for hypothetical cohorts of men and women with non-primary progressive MS. We used the Expanded Disability Status Scale as the measure of disability and included both relapses and disease progression in the model. We evaluated treatment strategies assuming a 10-year treatment duration using the societal perspective. We elicited preferences for disability and treatment states using standard-gamble questions and modeled the disutility associated with treatment administration and side effects explicitly. Main outcome measures were net gains in quality-adjusted life expectancy and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in dollars per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained.
Results: For treatment duration of 10 years for newly diagnosed non-primary progressive MS, interferon beta-1a yielded the largest gain in quality-adjusted life expectancy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2,200,000/QALY for women and $1,800,000/QALY for men, compared with no treatment. For a 5-year treatment duration, a "no treatment" strategy yielded more quality-adjusted life years than any of the treatment strategies. Cost-effectiveness ratios were similar for all three immunomodulatory treatments evaluated.
Conclusions: Cost-effectiveness results for all three immunomodulatory treatments for MS were unfavorable in the simulated study population under a wide range of assumptions. For treatment duration less than or equal to 5 years, expected benefits of treatment may not outweigh disutility associated with side effects and treatment discomfort.
Similar articles
-
Comparing the cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying drugs for the first-line treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.J Manag Care Pharm. 2009 Sep;15(7):543-55. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2009.15.7.543. J Manag Care Pharm. 2009. PMID: 19739877 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term cost-effectiveness model of interferon beta-1b in the early treatment of multiple sclerosis in the United States.Clin Ther. 2012 Sep;34(9):1966-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 18. Clin Ther. 2012. PMID: 22906738 Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of disease modifiying drugs (interferons and glatiramer acetate) as first line treatments in remitting-relapsing multiple sclerosis patients.J Med Econ. 2012;15(3):424-33. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.654868. Epub 2012 Jan 27. J Med Econ. 2012. PMID: 22217249
-
Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.Drugs. 2010 Sep 10;70(13):1677-91. doi: 10.2165/11538000-000000000-00000. Drugs. 2010. PMID: 20731475 Review.
-
Methods for expected value of information analysis in complex health economic models: developments on the health economics of interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate for multiple sclerosis.Health Technol Assess. 2004 Jun;8(27):iii, 1-78. doi: 10.3310/hta8270. Health Technol Assess. 2004. PMID: 15215017 Review.
Cited by
-
Recent developments in decision-analytic modelling for economic evaluation.Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(11):1043-53. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624110-00002. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006. PMID: 17067190 Review.
-
Costs and quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis in Europe.J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006 Aug;77(8):918-26. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.090365. Epub 2006 May 11. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006. PMID: 16690691 Free PMC article.
-
How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review.Neurol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):557-583. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00264-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19. Neurol Ther. 2021. PMID: 34279847 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost-effectiveness of injectable disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in Spain.Eur J Health Econ. 2014 May;15(4):353-62. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0478-z. Epub 2013 Apr 25. Eur J Health Econ. 2014. PMID: 23615954
-
Comparative effectiveness and child health.Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Aug 1;30(8):637-45. doi: 10.2165/11633830-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012. PMID: 22788256
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical