Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1992 Mar;2(2):82-7.
doi: 10.1007/BF01623841.

Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography

Affiliations

Effective dose values in bone mineral measurements by photon absorptiometry and computed tomography

W A Kalender. Osteoporos Int. 1992 Mar.

Abstract

A high degree of uncertainty and irritation predominates in the assessment and comparison of radiation dose values resulting from measurements of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine by photon absorptiometry and X-ray computed tomography. The skin dose values which are usually given in the literature are of limited relevance because the size of the irradiated volumes, the relative sensitivity of the affected organs and the radiation energies are not taken into account. The concept of effective dose, sometimes called whole-body equivalent dose, has to be applied. A detailed analysis results in an effective dose value of about 1 microSv for absorptiometry and about 30 microSv for computed tomography when low kV and mAs values are used. Lateral localizer radiographs, which are necessary for slice selection in CT, mean an additional dose of 30 microSv. Lateral X-ray films of the spine which are frequently taken in combination with absorptiometry result in a dose of 700 microSv or more. The concept of effective dose, the basic data and assumptions used in its assessment and a comparison with other dose burdens (for example the natural background radiation, of typically 2400 microSv per year) are discussed in detail.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rofo. 1990 Nov;153(5):516-21 - PubMed
    1. Ann Med Intern Fenn. 1960;49:57-65 - PubMed
    1. Med Phys. 1981 Jul-Aug;8(4):488-95 - PubMed
    1. Rofo. 1989 Oct;151(4):487-90 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1988 Feb;166(2):574-5 - PubMed