Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2004 Jun;14(3):302-9; discussion 308.

[Traumatic dissection of the renal pedicle. Modalities of management in adults and children]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 15373170
Review

[Traumatic dissection of the renal pedicle. Modalities of management in adults and children]

[Article in French]
Jean-Alexandre Long et al. Prog Urol. 2004 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the medium-term results of treatment for traumatic dissection of the renal arteries in a series of 12 cases and to propose emergency management based on recent endovascular revascularization techniques.

Material and methods: Between January 1999 and July 2003, 12 patients were admitted for closed trauma of the renal artery. There were 11 dissections with thrombosis and 1 intimal flap without distal thrombosis. Six patients were revascularized surgically (3 reno-renal bypass grafts, 3 auto-transplantations), 4 patients were treated by an endovascular procedure and 2 patients were treated conservatively with simple surveillance. Renal function, renal artery patency and blood pressure were evaluated immediately and at 3 months by clinical examination, Doppler ultrasound of the renal artery or CT angiography, and renal scintigraphy.

Results: In the group of 6 patients undergoing surgical revascularization (mean warm ischaemia time: 8 hours 30 minutes), 2 nephrectomies were performed (1 failure of revascularization, 1 sepsis in a non-functioning kidney). The other 4 patients presented negligible renal function on scintigraphy at 3 months despite patent renal arteries. Among the 4 patients undergoing endovascular revascularization (mean warm ischaemia time: 8 hours 50 minutes), 2 died from associated lesions and 2 had a non-functioning kidney (1 stent thrombosis, 1 silent kidney despite a patent renal artery). No cases of hypertension were observed regardless of the type of management.

Conclusion: Renal revascularization after thrombosis due to traumatic dissection of the renal artery must not be performed systematically after a warm ischaemia time of more than 4 hours in view of the poor recovery of renal function and the absence of morbidity associated with simple surveillance. When a procedure is performed, evaluation of the results must be based on morphological as well as functional parameters (scintigraphy).

PubMed Disclaimer