The relationship between species detection probability and local extinction probability
- PMID: 15375685
- DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1641-0
The relationship between species detection probability and local extinction probability
Abstract
In community-level ecological studies, generally not all species present in sampled areas are detected. Many authors have proposed the use of estimation methods that allow detection probabilities that are <1 and that are heterogeneous among species. These methods can also be used to estimate community-dynamic parameters such as species local extinction probability and turnover rates (Nichols et al. Ecol Appl 8:1213-1225; Conserv Biol 12:1390-1398). Here, we present an ad hoc approach to estimating community-level vital rates in the presence of joint heterogeneity of detection probabilities and vital rates. The method consists of partitioning the number of species into two groups using the detection frequencies and then estimating vital rates (e.g., local extinction probabilities) for each group. Estimators from each group are combined in a weighted estimator of vital rates that accounts for the effect of heterogeneity. Using data from the North American Breeding Bird Survey, we computed such estimates and tested the hypothesis that detection probabilities and local extinction probabilities were negatively related. Our analyses support the hypothesis that species detection probability covaries negatively with local probability of extinction and turnover rates. A simulation study was conducted to assess the performance of vital parameter estimators as well as other estimators relevant to questions about heterogeneity, such as coefficient of variation of detection probabilities and proportion of species in each group. Both the weighted estimator suggested in this paper and the original unweighted estimator for local extinction probability performed fairly well and provided no basis for preferring one to the other.
Similar articles
-
Site-occupancy distribution modeling to correct population-trend estimates derived from opportunistic observations.Conserv Biol. 2010 Oct;24(5):1388-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01479.x. Conserv Biol. 2010. PMID: 20337672
-
Determinants of local extinction and turnover rates in urban bird communities.Ecol Appl. 2007 Jan;17(1):168-80. doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2007)017[0168:doleat]2.0.co;2. Ecol Appl. 2007. PMID: 17479843
-
Site occupancy models with heterogeneous detection probabilities.Biometrics. 2006 Mar;62(1):97-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00439.x. Biometrics. 2006. PMID: 16542234
-
A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 Nov;82(4):607-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00028.x. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007. PMID: 17944620 Review.
-
Refined avian risk assessment for chlorpyrifos in the United States.Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014;231:163-217. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-03865-0_6. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 2014. PMID: 24723136 Review.
Cited by
-
Population size influences amphibian detection probability: implications for biodiversity monitoring programs.PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028244. Epub 2011 Dec 2. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 22164250 Free PMC article.
-
Spatial effects on species persistence and implications for biodiversity.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108(11):4346-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017274108. Epub 2011 Feb 28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011. PMID: 21368181 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources