Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2004 Sep;85(9):1555-60.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.011.

Leg muscle activity during walking with assistive devices at varying levels of weight bearing

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Leg muscle activity during walking with assistive devices at varying levels of weight bearing

Brian C Clark et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the muscle activation patterns at varying levels of weight-bearing forces during assisted walking with an axillary crutch and a recently designed device that allows weight transfer through the pelvic girdle (ED Walker).

Design: Descriptive, repeated measures.

Setting: University-based research laboratory.

Participants: Twelve healthy volunteers (age, 39.6+/-13.6 y).

Interventions: Not applicable.

Main outcome measures: Electromyographic activity was recorded from the anterior tibialis, soleus, biceps femoris, and vastus lateralis muscles on a test leg during assisted axillary crutch and ED Walker ambulation. Force platform readings measured weight-bearing load (non, light, heavy). These values were normalized to normal walking gait.

Results: In the vastus lateralis and soleus muscles, both devices allowed for approximately 50% and 65% reductions in electromyographic activity during the non-weight-bearing condition. During crutch ambulation, electromyographic activity of the soleus was significantly reduced compared with that required for normal walking at all levels of weight-bearing load. In the vastus lateralis for the weight-bearing conditions, the ED Walker required significantly higher electromyographic activity than crutch ambulation (light: 105.0%+/-12.3% vs 72.7%+/-10.1%; heavy: 144.8%+/-23.5% vs 100.0%+/-13.5%). Both devices required similar peak vertical ground reaction forces during the heavy weight-bearing conditions (crutch: 75%+/-1.6%; ED Walker: 73%+/-1.8%), whereas axillary crutch gait produced less force than the ED Walker in the light condition (32%+/-2.0% vs 48%+/-1.6%).

Conclusions: During walking with assistive devices, muscle activation patterns varied with weight-bearing load. The leg extensor muscles appeared to incur a greater reduction in muscle activity when compared with their flexor counterparts. Additionally, the ED Walker and axillary crutch differed with respect to their muscle activity levels and weight-bearing characteristics. Clinically, knowledge of these muscle activity and force characteristics may aid in the decision-making process of prescribing a device type and timeline to follow in restoring weight-bearing loads.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources