Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Sep 25;329(7468):708.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38216.868808.7C. Epub 2004 Sep 17.

Randomised controlled trial of physiotherapy compared with advice for low back pain

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised controlled trial of physiotherapy compared with advice for low back pain

Helen Frost et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To measure the effectiveness of routine physiotherapy compared with an assessment session and advice from a physiotherapist for patients with low back pain.

Design: Pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Seven British NHS physiotherapy departments.

Participants: 286 patients with low back pain of more than six weeks' duration.

Intervention: Routine physiotherapy or advice on remaining active from a physiotherapist. Both groups received an advice book.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was scores on the Oswestry disability index at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were scores on the Oswestry disability index (two and six months), scores on the Roland and Morris disability questionnaire and SF-36 (2, 6 and 12 months), and patient perceived benefit from treatment (2, 6, and 12 months).

Results: 200 of 286 patients (70%) provided follow up information at 12 months. Patients in the therapy group reported enhanced perceptions of benefit, but there was no evidence of a long term effect of physiotherapy in either disease specific or generic outcome measures (mean difference in change in Oswestry disability index scores at 12 months -1.0%, 95% confidence interval -3.7% to 1.6%). The most common treatments were low velocity spinal joint mobilisation techniques (72%, 104 of 144 patients) and lumbar spine mobility and abdominal strengthening exercises (94%, 136 patients).

Conclusions: Routine physiotherapy seemed to be no more effective than one session of assessment and advice from a physiotherapist.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of patients through trial

Comment in

References

    1. Klaber Moffett J, Richardson G, Sheldon TA, Maynard A. Back pain. Its management and cost to society. University of York: Centre for Health Economics, NHS Centre for Reviews and dissemination, 1995. (Discussion paper No 129.)
    1. Clinical Standards Advisory Group. Epidemiology review: the epidemiology and cost of back pain. London: HMSO, 1994.
    1. Maniadakis N, Gray A. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 2000;84: 95-103. - PubMed
    1. Knight M, Stewart-Brown S, Fletcher L. Estimating health needs: the impact of a checklist of conditions and quality of life measurement on health information derived from community surveys. J Public Health Med 2001;23: 179-86. - PubMed
    1. Foster N, Thompson K, Baxter G, Allen JM. Management of non-specific low back pain by therapists in Britain and Ireland. Spine 1999;24: 1332-42. - PubMed