Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Oct;240(4):578-83; discussion 583-5.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7.

Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia

Jacobus W A Burger  1 , Roland W Luijendijk, Wim C J Hop, Jens A Halm, Emiel G G Verdaasdonk, Johannes Jeekel
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia

Jacobus W A Burger et al. Ann Surg. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the best treatment of incisional hernia, taking into account recurrence, complications, discomfort, cosmetic result, and patient satisfaction.

Background: Long-term results of incisional hernia repair are lacking. Retrospective studies and the midterm results of this study indicate that mesh repair is superior to suture repair. However, many surgeons are still performing suture repair.

Methods: Between 1992 and 1998, a multicenter trial was performed, in which 181 eligible patients with a primary or first-time recurrent midline incisional hernia were randomly assigned to suture or mesh repair. In 2003, follow-up was updated.

Results: Median follow-up was 75 months for suture repair and 81 months for mesh repair patients. The 10-year cumulative rate of recurrence was 63% for suture repair and 32% for mesh repair (P < 0.001). Abdominal aneurysm (P = 0.01) and wound infection (P = 0.02) were identified as independent risk factors for recurrence. In patients with small incisional hernias, the recurrence rates were 67% after suture repair and 17% after mesh repair (P = 0.003). One hundred twenty-six patients completed long-term follow-up (median follow-up 98 months). In the mesh repair group, 17% suffered a complication, compared with 8% in the suture repair group (P = 0.17). Abdominal pain was more frequent in suture repair patients (P = 0.01), but there was no difference in scar pain, cosmetic result, and patient satisfaction.

Conclusions: Mesh repair results in a lower recurrence rate and less abdominal pain and does not result in more complications than suture repair. Suture repair of incisional hernia should be abandoned.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Kaplan-Meier curves for recurrence of hernia after repair of a primary or first recurrent incisional hernia according to whether the patient was assigned to suture repair (97 patients) or mesh repair (84 patients). There were significantly fewer recurrences in patients who were assigned to mesh repair (P < 0.001).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10-year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg. 1985;72:70–71. - PubMed
    1. Lewis RT, Wiegand FM. Natural history of vertical abdominal parietal closure: Prolene versus Dexon. Can J Surg. 1989;32:196–200. - PubMed
    1. Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM Jr, Reines HD, et al. Greater risk of incisional hernia with morbidly obese than steroid-dependent patients and low recurrence with prefascial polypropylene mesh. Am J Surg. 1996;171:80–84. - PubMed
    1. Hodgson NC, Malthaner RA, Ostbye T. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2000;231:436–442. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, et al. [Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia: a retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years]. Chirurg. 2002;73:474–480. - PubMed

MeSH terms