Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004:20:111-6.

Erythropoietin resistance in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Affiliations
  • PMID: 15384808
Clinical Trial

Erythropoietin resistance in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Hidetomo Nakamoto et al. Adv Perit Dial. 2004.

Abstract

Anemia is one of the most serious complications in patients on dialysis. Erythropoietin improves the anemia. However, erythropoietin resistance is sometimes encountered from causes such as functional iron deficiency, secondary hyperparathyroidism, blood loss, or interaction with other drugs. To clarify the interaction between erythropoietin and the renin-angiotensin system, we studied the maintenance dose of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) with and without angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEIs), angiotensin II type I receptor blockers (ARBs), and calcium channel blockers. We divided 36 hypertensive patients on CAPD into three groups--an ACEI group (n = 12), an ARB group (n = 12), and a Ca channel blocker group (n = 12)--and then we compared the doses of rHuEPO required to maintain the patients' hematocrit (Hct) above 30%. In the Ca channel blocker group, the weekly dose of erythropoietin had not changed significantly at the end of the study (74 +/- 7 U/kg at the end vs. 76 +/- 8 U/kg at the start). The (oral) ACEI group needed a significantly higher weekly dose of erythropoietin at the end of the study (89 -/+ 9 U/kg at the end vs. 74 -/+ 8 U/kg at the start, p < 0.01). The (oral) ARB group also needed a significantly higher weekly dose of erythropoietin at the end of the study (82 -/+ 10 U/kg at the end vs. 76 +/- 8 U/kg at the start, p < 0.05). Furthermore, the weekly dose of erythropoietin required in the ACEI group was significantly larger than that required in the ARB group. We conclude that treatment with ACEIs and ARBs induces erythropoietin resistance in patients on CAPD. The inhibitory effect of ARBs on erythropoiesis is less than that of ACEIs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources