Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Oct;99(4):1038-1043.
doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000132547.39180.88.

Peripherally inserted central catheters: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial in pediatric surgical patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Peripherally inserted central catheters: a randomized, controlled, prospective trial in pediatric surgical patients

Deborah A Schwengel et al. Anesth Analg. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Peripherally-inserted central catheters (PICCs) are long-term IV catheters used for drug and fluid administration, blood sampling, or hyperalimentation. The short-term use of PICCs in postoperative patients has not been studied. In this randomized, controlled trial, patients received either a PICC or peripheral IV catheter (PIV). Our outcome measures were patient and parent satisfaction with care, complications of the venous access devices, number of postoperative venipunctures, and cost-effectiveness of use. Satisfaction was significantly more frequent in the PICC group (P < 0.05), and there were significantly fewer postoperative needle punctures in the PICC group compared with the PIV group (P < 0.05). Minor complications were common in the PIV group; major complications were uncommon in both groups. PICCs are more expensive, but better satisfaction can make them a cost-effective option. Additionally, insertion during surgical preparation time in the operating room (OR) means that cost is not increased by adding anesthesiologist and OR time. Anesthesiologists should consider placing PICCs in patients requiring more than 4 days of in-hospital postoperative care, especially if frequent blood sampling or IV access is required.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dolcourt J, Bose C. Percutaneous insertion of silastic central venous catheters in newborn infants. Pediatrics 1982;70:484–6.
    1. Durand M, Ramanathan R, Martinelli B, Tolentino M. Prospective evaluation of percutaneous central venous silastic catheters in newborn infants with birth weights of 510 to 3920 grams. Pediatrics 1986;78:245–50.
    1. Rudin C, Nars PW. A comparative study of two different percutaneous venous catheters in newborn infants. Eur J Pediatr 1990;150:119–24.
    1. Chathas MK, Paton JB, Fisher DE. Percutaneous central venous catheterization. Am J Dis Child 1990;144:1246–50.
    1. Soong WJ, Hwang B. Percutaneous central venous catheterization: five year experiment in a neonatal intensive care unit. Acta Paediatr Sin 1993;34:356–66.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources