Robot-assisted abdominal surgery
- PMID: 15386325
- DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4700
Robot-assisted abdominal surgery
Abstract
Background: Robotic assistance or telemanipulation is the latest technological advance in minimally invasive surgery. Its future implementation will depend on the advantages that it can provide over standard laparoscopy or open surgery.
Methods: All Medline-cited papers (from case reports to reviews) about telemanipulators used in visceral surgery were assessed. The data in each paper were analysed to enable an up-to-date review of robot-assisted abdominal surgery by the most advanced telemanipulator (da Vinci).
Results: Most papers presented case series demonstrating the feasibility of robotic technology in performing a specific procedure. Comparative studies of robot-assisted surgery versus standard laparoscopic or open surgery were usually matched cohort studies. They generally showed an increased operating time for robot-assisted procedures but with similar rates of conversion, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and mortality in comparison to those of laparoscopic surgery. Consistent long-term follow-up data were missing and only one randomized clinical trial was conducted.
Conclusion: Robot-assisted surgery appears safe and feasible for certain standard surgical procedures. However, at its current level of development, it offers no clear, significant advantage over standard laparoscopic techniques.
Copyright (c) 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd
Similar articles
-
First year experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery with 153 cases in a general surgery department: indications, technique and results.Chirurgia (Bucur). 2009 Mar-Apr;104(2):141-50. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2009. PMID: 19499656
-
Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.Br J Surg. 2006 May;93(5):553-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5325. Br J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16552744 Clinical Trial.
-
A new era in laparoscopic surgery. Evaluation of robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures.Saudi Med J. 2005 May;26(5):777-80. Saudi Med J. 2005. PMID: 15951869
-
[The da Vinci surgical system in digestive surgery].Rev Med Suisse. 2007 Jun 27;3(117):1622-6. Rev Med Suisse. 2007. PMID: 17708229 Review. French.
-
Minimally invasive abdominal surgery: lux et veritas past, present, and future.Am J Surg. 2005 Aug;190(2):239-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.05.019. Am J Surg. 2005. PMID: 16023438 Review.
Cited by
-
Robot-assisted common bile duct exploration as an option for complex choledocholithiasis.Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):263-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2431-0. Epub 2012 Jul 7. Surg Endosc. 2013. PMID: 22773235
-
Computer-assisted abdominal surgery: new technologies.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Apr;400(3):273-81. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1289-8. Epub 2015 Feb 21. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015. PMID: 25701196 Review.
-
Laparoscopic robotic-assisted gastrointestinal surgery: the Geneva experience.J Robot Surg. 2008;1(4):291-5. doi: 10.1007/s11701-007-0058-2. Epub 2008 Jan 4. J Robot Surg. 2008. PMID: 25484980 Free PMC article.
-
Renal cavernous hemangioma: robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with selective warm ischemia. Case report and review of the literature.G Chir. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):197-200. doi: 10.11138/gchir/2015.36.5.197. G Chir. 2015. PMID: 26712254 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Postoperative outcomes in robotic gastric resection compared with laparoscopic gastric resection in gastric cancer: A meta-analysis and systemic review.Health Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 16;5(5):e746. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.746. eCollection 2022 Sep. Health Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35989947 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical