Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness
- PMID: 15388512
- DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meh060
Gloves and dermal exposure to chemicals: proposals for evaluating workplace effectiveness
Abstract
There are standardized laboratory tests for chemical protective gloves that provide estimates of breakthrough time and steady-state permeation flux. However, there is evidence to suggest that these tests may not be completely relevant to glove usage in the workplace. There is no consensus about how glove workplace effectiveness should be assessed, although a few studies have attempted to measure the effectiveness of chemical protective gloves. We have used a conceptual model of dermal exposure to help analyse how workers' skin may become exposed while wearing gloves, and propose a new glove workplace protection factor (PFgloves), which is based on the ratio of the estimated uptake of chemicals through the hands without gloves to the uptake through the hands while wearing protective gloves. Mathematical simulations demonstrate that glove protection factor is unlikely to be constant for a glove type, but will be strongly influenced by the work situation and the duration of the exposure. This has important consequences for the selection of protective gloves.
Similar articles
-
Permeability of hair dye compounds p-phenylenediamine, toluene-2,5-diaminesulfate and resorcinol through protective gloves in hairdressing.Ann Occup Hyg. 2007 Jul;51(5):479-85. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mem028. Epub 2007 Jun 25. Ann Occup Hyg. 2007. PMID: 17595170
-
Permeation of hair dye ingredients, p-phenylenediamine and aminophenol isomers, through protective gloves.Ann Occup Hyg. 2009 Apr;53(3):289-96. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep009. Epub 2009 Mar 11. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009. PMID: 19279162
-
Assessment of skin exposure to N,N-dimethylformamide and methyl ethylketone through chemical protective gloves and decontamination of gloves for reuse purposes.Sci Total Environ. 2011 Feb 15;409(6):1024-32. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.11.034. Epub 2010 Dec 30. Sci Total Environ. 2011. PMID: 21194731
-
Glove permeation of chemicals: The state of the art of current practice, Part 1: Basics and the permeation standards.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2019 Dec;16(12):827-839. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1678754. Epub 2019 Nov 4. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2019. PMID: 31684851 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Protective gloves of polymeric materials. Experimental permeation testing and clinical study of side effects.Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1991;163:1-54. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1991. PMID: 1771997 Review.
Cited by
-
Workers' compensation claim counts and rates by injury event/exposure among state-insured private employers in Ohio, 2007-2017.J Safety Res. 2021 Dec;79:148-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.08.015. Epub 2021 Sep 17. J Safety Res. 2021. PMID: 34847999 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of dermal exposure assessment in the US Environmental Protection Agency Toxic Substances Control Act risk evaluations of chemical manufacturing.Toxicol Ind Health. 2023 Jan;39(1):49-65. doi: 10.1177/07482337221140946. Epub 2022 Nov 24. Toxicol Ind Health. 2023. PMID: 36420912 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Glove permeation of chemicals: The state of the art of current practice-Part 2. Research emphases on high boiling point compounds and simulating the donned glove environment.J Occup Environ Hyg. 2020 Apr;17(4):135-164. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2020.1721509. Epub 2020 Mar 25. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2020. PMID: 32209007 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Short-term Protective Effects of 'Non-PPE' Gloves Used by Greenhouse Workers.Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 Oct;59(8):1044-57. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev051. Epub 2015 Aug 2. Ann Occup Hyg. 2015. PMID: 26240197 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical