Double gloving. Protecting surgeons from blood contamination in the operating room
- PMID: 1540100
- DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420020103014
Double gloving. Protecting surgeons from blood contamination in the operating room
Abstract
Health care workers, particularly surgeons, understand the importance of preventing contamination from blood of patients infected with deadly viruses. One of the most common areas of contamination is the hands and fingers due to the failure of glove protection. There are varying opinions regarding the frequency of glove failure, the necessity of wearing two gloves for added protection, and the ability to operate when wearing two gloves. We performed a prospective, randomized, trial of 143 procedures involving 284 persons to answer these questions for surgeons and first assistants. Overall, the glove failure rate (blood contamination of the fingers) was 51% when one glove was worn and 7% when two gloves were worn. Acceptability was 88% in the group who agreed to wear two gloves, and 88% of these did not perceive that tactile sense was significantly impaired. We believe that double gloving should be, and can be, used routinely during major surgical procedures to protect surgeons from blood contamination.
Similar articles
-
Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery.Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.08.017. Epub 2012 Feb 17. Am J Surg. 2012. PMID: 22342011 Clinical Trial.
-
Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.Postgrad Med J. 2001 Jul;77(909):458-60. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.909.458. Postgrad Med J. 2001. PMID: 11423598 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Double gloving in reducing the interoperative risk of blood borne pathogens].Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2004;69(4):249-54. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2004. PMID: 15587381 Polish.
-
Double gloving: a risk reduction strategy.Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Jul;29(7):369-78. doi: 10.1016/s1549-3741(03)29045-6. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003. PMID: 12856559 Review.
-
Choosing the right surgical glove: an overview and update.Br J Nurs. 2008 Jun 26-Jul 9;17(12):740-4. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2008.17.12.30292. Br J Nurs. 2008. PMID: 18825848 Review.
Cited by
-
Subjective effects of double gloves on surgical performance.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996 Jan;78(1):20-2. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1996. PMID: 8659967 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Knowledge, attitude, and practices related to standard precautions of surgeons and physicians in university-affiliated hospitals of Shiraz, Iran.Int J Infect Dis. 2007 May;11(3):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Jul 11. Int J Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 16837226 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical glove perforation during laparoscopic colorectal procedures.Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3489-3494. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08670-0. Epub 2021 Aug 11. Surg Endosc. 2022. PMID: 34382122 Free PMC article.
-
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16855997 Free PMC article.
-
Intraoperative surgical site infection control and prevention: a position paper and future addendum to WSES intra-abdominal infections guidelines.World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb 10;15(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-0288-4. World J Emerg Surg. 2020. PMID: 32041636 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical