Quantitative and qualitative coronary angiographic analysis: review of methods, utility, and limitations
- PMID: 1544153
- DOI: 10.1002/ccd.1810250207
Quantitative and qualitative coronary angiographic analysis: review of methods, utility, and limitations
Abstract
Coronary angiography continues to be the pivotal study in the diagnosis and treatment of ischemic cardiac disease. Although angiographic equipment and imaging techniques have advanced over the past three decades, the analysis of coronary angiograms, by visual estimated percent diameter stenosis, has remained unchanged in most clinical catheterization laboratories. Rapid, computerized angiographic analysis systems are now available that remedy the inherent imprecision and inaccuracies plaguing visual coronary analysis. Despite its advantages, successful QCA is quite dependent on meticulous attention to radiographic and angiographic technique, even more so than with visual analysis. Although the available QCA systems can reproducibly and accurately define the site and degree of coronary stenosis, they cannot routinely determine whether an obstruction is flow limiting. Several methods, some based on extrapolations of quantitative measures alone, and others based on digital subtraction angiography, have been developed to determine the physiologic impact of a given coronary lesion. Recent observations have demonstrated, however, that even if the physiologic consequences of an obstruction are known, the prognosis of the lesion over time cannot be predicted. The qualitative, morphologic characteristics of a lesion are as, or more, important than the quantitative lesion attributes in determining an atheroma's behavior and stability, and hence, qualitative descriptors should be incorporated into QCA analyses. Although not currently available, future QCA systems will provide, by automated analysis, reproducible and accurate measures of absolute obstruction, physiologic data describing the flow limiting characteristics of a lesion, and qualitative, morphologic lesion descriptors. Implementation of these systems should provide more consistent and accurate prognostic and pathophysiologic information, thereby helping to refine and more effectively direct therapeutic interventions in coronary artery disease.
Similar articles
-
Visual estimation versus different quantitative coronary angiography methods to assess lesion severity in bifurcation lesions.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;91(7):1263-1270. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27243. Epub 2017 Aug 24. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018. PMID: 28836339 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of angiographic center and local site analysis of PTCA results in a multicenter angioplasty-restenosis trial. The M Heart Group.Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992 Sep;27(1):8-13. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810270104. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1992. PMID: 1525816 Clinical Trial.
-
The impact of acquisition angle differences on three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):214-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23047. Epub 2011 Jul 15. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011. PMID: 21766427
-
The need for dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) software algorithms to evaluate bifurcation lesions.EuroIntervention. 2015;11 Suppl V:V44-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11SVA10. EuroIntervention. 2015. PMID: 25983170 Review.
-
Quantitative coronary angiography in the current era: principles and applications.J Interv Cardiol. 2009 Dec;22(6):527-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2009.00491.x. Epub 2009 Jul 13. J Interv Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19627430 Review.
Cited by
-
Which media are most likely to solve the archival problem?Int J Card Imaging. 1994 Sep;10(3):165-75. doi: 10.1007/BF01137898. Int J Card Imaging. 1994. PMID: 7876656
-
Gender differences in the prevalence of coronary artery tortuosity and its association with coronary artery disease.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2016 Nov 30;14:23-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2016.11.005. eCollection 2017 Mar. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2016. PMID: 28616559 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing Machine Learning in Interventional Cardiology: The Benefits Are Worth the Trouble.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 8;8:711401. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.711401. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34957230 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Relationship of the percentage of circulating endothelial progenitor cell to the severity of coronary artery disease.Heart Vessels. 2008 Jan;23(1):47-52. doi: 10.1007/s00380-007-1006-9. Epub 2008 Feb 14. Heart Vessels. 2008. PMID: 18273546
-
Angiographic validation of the American College of Cardiology Foundation-the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Collaboration on the Comparative Effectiveness of Revascularization Strategies study.Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(1):11-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.113.000679. Epub 2014 Feb 4. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014. PMID: 24496239 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous