[Should the RhD prophylaxis be adjusted?]

Your saved search

Your RSS Feed

Editorial

. 2004 Aug 30;166(36):3072.

[Article in Danish]

Editorial

[Article in Danish]

Jørgen Georgsen et al. Ugeskr Laeger. 2004.

. 2004 Aug 30;166(36):3072.

No abstract available

Similar articles

[RhD immunoprophylaxis should be adjusted].
Bock JE, Larsen JF. Bock JE, et al. Ugeskr Laeger. 2004 Aug 30;166(36):3113. Ugeskr Laeger. 2004. PMID: 15387315 Danish. No abstract available.
[Prophylactic anti-D for RhD- patient in France: an hasty recommendation?].
Benachi A, Nisand I. Benachi A, et al. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2007 Oct;36(6):523-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.06.010. Epub 2007 Jul 24. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2007. PMID: 17651919 French. No abstract available.
[Clinical guidelines on anti-D prophylaxis: hasty critics?].
Carbonne B, Marpeau L, Brossard Y. Carbonne B, et al. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2007 Oct;36(6):526-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2007.09.002. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2007. PMID: 17893030 French. No abstract available.
[Prevention of Rh immunization. II. Management of the risk during the second half of pregnancy and postpartum].
Larsen JF, Bock JE, Jørgensen JR. Larsen JF, et al. Ugeskr Laeger. 2004 Aug 30;166(36):3078-83. Ugeskr Laeger. 2004. PMID: 15387304 Review. Danish. No abstract available.
[Prevention of Rh immunization. I. Theoretical background and management of the risk during the first half of pregnancy].
Larsen JF, Bock JE, Jørgensen JR. Larsen JF, et al. Ugeskr Laeger. 2004 Aug 30;166(36):3073-8. Ugeskr Laeger. 2004. PMID: 15387303 Review. Danish. No abstract available.