Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Sep;86(7):979-82.
doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b7.14991.

Patient preferences in knee prostheses

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Patient preferences in knee prostheses

J W Pritchett. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Sep.

Abstract

A total of 344 patients underwent bilateral total knee replacement (TKR) using a different prosthesis on each side. Four knee prostheses were used: anterior and posterior cruciate-retaining (ACL-PCL), posterior cruciate-retaining (PCL), medial or lateral pivot (MLP), and posterior cruciate-substituting (PS). All patients had good or excellent results. The range of movement, relief from pain, alignment, and stability did not vary among any of the prostheses. Forty-one of 46 patients (89%) preferred the ACL-PCL to the PS knee and 27 of 35 patients (77%) the MLP knee to the PS knee. Of the patients with an ACL-PCL knee on one side and a MLP on the other, an equal number preferred each type. The MLP knee was preferred to the PCL by 34 (79%) patients. PS and PCL knees were preferred equally. Patients with bilateral TKRs preferred retention of both their cruciate ligaments or substitution with a medial or lateral pivot prosthesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Patient preferences in knee prostheses.
    Roposch A. Roposch A. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Aug;87(8):1164-5; author reply 1165. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B8.16721. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005. PMID: 16049258 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources