Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral calculi: thin-slice CT findings
- PMID: 15448998
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2511-1
Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral calculi: thin-slice CT findings
Abstract
The objective is to evaluate the appearance of phleboliths and distal ureteral stones by determining their roundness and presence of central lucency on thin-slice CT. Seventy-seven patients with pelvic radioopacities at unenhanced CT were selected. Those patients consequently underwent thin-slice CT with 1-mm collimation, a FOV of 10 cm, a pitch of 1:1 and a bone reconstruction algorithm. Three radiologists reviewed all images for roundness and the presence of central radiolucency. No calculi showed central lucency on either imaging technique used. Thin-slice CT revealed central lucency in 60% of phleboliths with 100% specificity. Three of 40 ureteral stones showed round contour. Thin-slice CT revealed a round contour in 97% of phleboliths with 93% specificity. Central lucency is a characteristic finding of pelvic phleboliths on thin-slice CT. This finding can therefore be used in combination with roundness as a problem-solving tool in differentiating phleboliths from distal ureteral stones.
Similar articles
-
Central lucency of pelvic phleboliths: comparison of radiographs and noncontrast helical CT.Clin Imaging. 2001 Mar-Apr;25(2):122-5. doi: 10.1016/s0899-7071(01)00259-5. Clin Imaging. 2001. PMID: 11483423
-
Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral stones on routine unenhanced helical CT: is there a radiolucent center?AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Jan;172(1):13-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888730. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999. PMID: 9888730
-
Unenhanced helical CT criteria to differentiate distal ureteral calculi from pelvic phleboliths.Radiology. 1998 May;207(2):363-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577482. Radiology. 1998. PMID: 9577482
-
Is This Your Stone? Distinguishing Phleboliths and Nephroliths on Imaging in the Emergency Department Setting.J Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;62(3):316-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.10.034. Epub 2022 Jan 17. J Emerg Med. 2022. PMID: 35058092 Review.
-
[Ultra-low-dose CT to search for stones in kidneys and collecting system].Aktuelle Urol. 2004 Aug;35(4):307-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-830031. Aktuelle Urol. 2004. PMID: 15459870 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.Korean J Urol. 2010 Oct;51(10):713-8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.10.713. Epub 2010 Oct 21. Korean J Urol. 2010. PMID: 21031093 Free PMC article.
-
Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis.Eur Radiol. 2005 Nov;15(11):2238-43. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2742-9. Epub 2005 Apr 2. Eur Radiol. 2005. PMID: 15806362
-
Shining Pearls Sign: A New Identity for Venous Malformations on Computed Tomographic Imaging.Int J Angiol. 2016 Dec;25(5):e21-e24. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1371761. Epub 2014 Aug 1. Int J Angiol. 2016. PMID: 28031645 Free PMC article.
-
Urinary calculi: improved detection and characterization with thin-slice multidetector CT.Eur Radiol. 2006 Jan;16(1):161-5. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2813-y. Epub 2005 Jun 16. Eur Radiol. 2006. PMID: 15959786
-
Analyzing the effect of distance from skin to stone by computed tomography scan on the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy stone-free rate of renal stones.Korean J Urol. 2012 Jan;53(1):40-3. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.1.40. Epub 2012 Jan 25. Korean J Urol. 2012. PMID: 22323973 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical