The press-fit Kinemax knee arthroplasty. High failure rate of non-cemented implants
- PMID: 1544961
- DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.74B2.1544961
The press-fit Kinemax knee arthroplasty. High failure rate of non-cemented implants
Abstract
We report the results of 75 consecutive primary press-fit Kinemax arthroplasties with an average follow-up of 14 months (three to 28). We reviewed 26 cemented and 49 non-cemented tibial components implanted into 72 patients (30 men and 42 women, median age 70 years). At the latest follow-up the overall evaluation (Hospital for Special Surgery knee rating scale) for cemented cases was excellent in 54%, good in 42% and poor in 4%. No cemented prosthesis loosened. Of the non-cemented cases 55% were excellent, 23% good, and 2% fair. Ten tibial implants (20%) loosened and required revision. Residual pain marred the result in 24% of the non-cemented prostheses and in 4% of the cemented group. We do not recommend the press-fit, smooth-surfaced Kinemax prosthesis for non-cemented use.
Similar articles
-
The total condylar prosthesis. 10- to 12-year results of a cemented knee replacement.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989 Nov;71(5):793-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.71B5.2584249. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989. PMID: 2584249
-
Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.J Arthroplasty. 1997 Dec;12(8):896-903. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90159-5. J Arthroplasty. 1997. PMID: 9458255
-
Revision total knee arthroplasty with modular components inserted with metaphyseal cement and stems without cement.J Arthroplasty. 2005 Apr;20(3):302-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.08.010. J Arthroplasty. 2005. PMID: 15809946
-
Cemented humeral stem versus press-fit humeral stem in total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bone Joint J. 2019 Sep;101-B(9):1107-1114. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B9.BJJ-2018-1369.R1. Bone Joint J. 2019. PMID: 31474140
-
Isolated patellofemoral arthritis.Orthopedics. 1995 Sep;18(9):893-5. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19950901-35. Orthopedics. 1995. PMID: 8570501 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Does using autograft bone chips achieve consistent bone ingrowth in primary TKA?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jul;470(7):1869-78. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2214-2. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 22179980 Free PMC article.
-
Trends and developments in hip and knee arthroplasty technology.J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2021 Feb 8;8:2055668320952043. doi: 10.1177/2055668320952043. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2021. PMID: 33614108 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cementless total knee arthroplasty in young patients using tantalum trabecular implants results in significantly lower rates of aseptic loosening.Bone Jt Open. 2024 Apr 8;5(4):277-285. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.54.BJO-2023-0132.R1. Bone Jt Open. 2024. PMID: 38583872 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical outcomes and survivorship of cementless triathlon total knee arthroplasties: a systematic review.Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun 3;4(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s42836-022-00124-9. Arthroplasty. 2022. PMID: 35655250 Free PMC article.
-
Similar survival between uncemented and cemented fixation prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic comparative analysis using registers.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Dec;22(12):3191-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2806-3. Epub 2013 Dec 14. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014. PMID: 24337525