Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Sep 29:4:13.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-4-13.

Randomised controlled trial of gabapentin in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1 [ISRCTN84121379]

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomised controlled trial of gabapentin in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type 1 [ISRCTN84121379]

Anton C van de Vusse et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type one (CRPS I) or formerly Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy (RSD) is a disabling syndrome, in which a painful limb is accompanied by varying symptoms. Neuropathic pain is a prominent feature of CRPS I, and is often refractory to treatment. Since gabapentin is an anticonvulsant with a proven analgesic effect in various neuropathic pain syndromes, we sought to study the efficacy of the anticonvulsant gabapentin as treatment for pain in patients with CRPS I.

Methods: We did a randomized double blind placebo controlled crossover study with two three-weeks treatment periods with gabapentin and placebo separated by a two-weeks washout period. Patients started at random with gabapentin or placebo, which was administered in identical capsules three times daily. We included 58 patients with CRPS type 1.

Results: Patients reported significant pain relief in favor of gabapentin in the first period. Therapy effect in the second period was less; finally resulting in no significant effect combining results of both periods. The CRPS patients had sensory deficits at baseline. We found that this sensory deficit was significantly reversed in gabapentin users in comparison to placebo users.

Conclusions: Gabapentin had a mild effect on pain in CRPS I. It significantly reduced the sensory deficit in the affected limb. A subpopulation of CRPS patients may benefit from gabapentin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Selection of patients participating in the trial
Figure 2
Figure 2
VAS for pain in both groups at start (T0), three weeks (T1), five weeks (T2), and eight weeks (T3) after randomization. T0-1 is the first treatment period, and T2-3 the second
Figure 3
Figure 3
Global perceived pain relief (on a seven-point scale) as reported by patients. GBP-1 and -2 denote patients receiving GBP in the first and second period; placebo-1 and -2 are analogously denoted.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Veldman PH, Reynen HM, Arntz IE, Goris RJ. Signs and symptoms of reflex sympathetic dystrophy: Prospective study of 829 patients. Lancet. 1993;342:1012–1016. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92877-V. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Marchettini P, Lacerenza M, Ieracitano D, Canal N. Sensitized nociceptors in reflex sympathetic dystrophies. Funct Neurol. 1989;4:135–140. - PubMed
    1. Mackin G. Medical and pharmacologic management of upper extremity neuropathic pain syndromes. J Hand Ther. 1997;10:96–109. - PubMed
    1. Jänig W. The puzzle of "reflex sympathetic dystrophy": Mechanisms, hypotheses, open questions. In: Jänig W, Stanton-Hicks M, editor. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy. A reappraisal. 6 6. Seattle: IASP Press; 1996. pp. 1–24.
    1. Sindrup S, Jensen T. Pharmacologic treatment of pain in polyneuropathy. Neurology. 2000;55:915–920. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data