Magnification-corrected indirect biomicroscopy of the optic nerve head
- PMID: 15455240
- DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-1028-2
Magnification-corrected indirect biomicroscopy of the optic nerve head
Abstract
Background: Proper use of the new Super VitreoFundus and SuperPupil XL non-contact slit-lamp lenses for clinical disc biometry requires knowledge of their comparative magnification.
Methods: The optical performance of each fundus lens is described in terms of axial magnification, lens position, and the correction factor p (in degrees per millimeter) using a calibrated Gullstrand-type model eye adjusted for axial ametropia between -12.5 D and +12.6 D.
Results: The total change in axial magnification from myopia to hyperopia was -13.3% to +15.6% (Super VitreoFundus lens), and -13.9% to +14.1% (SuperPupil XL lens). When the fundus lens position was altered with respect to the model eye by +/-2 mm under myopic conditions the change in axial magnification was -5.1% to +7.7% (Super VitreoFundus lens), and -6.5% to +9.7% (SuperPupil XL lens). In the hyperopic condition the change was -3.8% to +5.8%, and -4.9% to +7.3%. Both fundus lenses exhibited a linear relationship between p and degree of ametropia of the model eye, while only the Super VitreoFundus lens displayed a constant relationship between p and ametropia of -5 D to +5 D.
Conclusions: Using the fundus lens correction factor (p), the clinician may be able to estimate the dimensions of optic nerve head features with sufficient accuracy to allow clinical decisions to be made in the evaluation of patients with diagnosed or suspected glaucoma.
Similar articles
-
Magnification characteristic of a +90-diopter double-aspheric fundus examination lens.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002 Jun;43(6):1817-9. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002. PMID: 12036984
-
Biomicroscopic measurement of the optic disc with a high-power positive lens.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001 Jan;42(1):153-7. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001. PMID: 11133860
-
Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses--dual optic vs mono optic.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004 Sep;24(5):450-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00222.x. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004. PMID: 15315660
-
Indirect fundus biomicroscopy.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995 Sep;15 Suppl 2:S38-41. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1995. PMID: 8532343 Review.
-
The role of the lens in refractive development of the eye: animal models of ametropia.Exp Eye Res. 2008 Jul;87(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 Mar 18. Exp Eye Res. 2008. PMID: 18405895 Review.
Cited by
-
Magnification-corrected photodynamic therapy.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar;245(3):333-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-006-0419-y. Epub 2006 Oct 6. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17024438
-
The effect of digital measurement software on photodynamic therapy.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;244(2):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s00417-005-0128-y. Epub 2005 Sep 17. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006. PMID: 16170534
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources