Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2004 Oct;80(5):342-8.
doi: 10.1136/sti.2003.006197.

The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design

N Low et al. Sex Transm Infect. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Screening has been recommended to reduce the prevalence and morbidity associated with genital chlamydia infection in the United Kingdom.

Methods: We describe the rationale and study design of the Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS), a collaborative project designed to evaluate screening outside genitourinary medicine clinics. A non-selective, active screening approach in 16-39 year olds randomly sampled from 27 general practice lists in the Bristol and Birmingham areas formed the basis of interlinked studies: a case-control study was used to investigate factors to improve the targeting of screening; participants with chlamydia were invited to enroll in a randomised controlled trial to evaluate partner notification conducted in primary care; and laboratory based studies were used to assess the best specimens and tests. We also explored psychosocial effects of screening and partner notification and modelled the cost effectiveness of the programme.

Conclusion: Results from four pilot practices show that mailing of specimens for chlamydia testing is feasible but that it is difficult to achieve high response rates with postal screening. The high prevalence of asymptomatic infection in men suggests that efforts to screen men for chlamydia should be strengthened.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sex Transm Infect. 2003 Feb;79(1):16-21 - PubMed
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Oct;31(5):891-3 - PubMed
    1. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70 - PubMed
    1. Sex Transm Dis. 1993 Jan-Feb;20(1):28-35 - PubMed
    1. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 May-Jun;27(3):108-11 - PubMed

Publication types