Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Oct;13(5):330-4.
doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.330.

Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects

Affiliations

Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects

L Lingard et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Ineffective team communication is frequently at the root of medical error. The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of communication failures in the operating room (OR) and to classify their effects. This study was part of a larger project to develop a team checklist to improve communication in the OR.

Methods: Trained observers recorded 90 hours of observation during 48 surgical procedures. Ninety four team members participated from anesthesia (16 staff, 6 fellows, 3 residents), surgery (14 staff, 8 fellows, 13 residents, 3 clerks), and nursing (31 staff). Field notes recording procedurally relevant communication events were analysed using a framework which considered the content, audience, purpose, and occasion of a communication exchange. A communication failure was defined as an event that was flawed in one or more of these dimensions.

Results: 421 communication events were noted, of which 129 were categorized as communication failures. Failure types included "occasion" (45.7% of instances) where timing was poor; "content" (35.7%) where information was missing or inaccurate, "purpose" (24.0%) where issues were not resolved, and "audience" (20.9%) where key individuals were excluded. 36.4% of failures resulted in visible effects on system processes including inefficiency, team tension, resource waste, workaround, delay, patient inconvenience and procedural error.

Conclusion: Communication failures in the OR exhibited a common set of problems. They occurred in approximately 30% of team exchanges and a third of these resulted in effects which jeopardized patient safety by increasing cognitive load, interrupting routine, and increasing tension in the OR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):781-5 - PubMed
    1. Qual Health Care. 2001 Jun;10(2):65-6 - PubMed
    1. Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10 Suppl 2:ii3-7 - PubMed
    1. Med Educ. 2002 Aug;36(8):728-34 - PubMed
    1. Group Dyn. 1997 Jun;1(2):169-82 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms