Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Oct;114(4):e459-68.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0455.

Validation of a multistage asthma case-detection procedure for elementary school children

Affiliations

Validation of a multistage asthma case-detection procedure for elementary school children

Lynn B Gerald et al. Pediatrics. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to validate a 3-stage asthma case-detection procedure for elementary school-aged children.

Methods: The study was performed in 10 elementary schools in 4 inner-city school systems, with a total enrollment of 3539 children. Results of the case-detection procedure were compared with the diagnosis of an asthma specialist study physician, to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the case-detection procedure.

Results: Ninety-eight percent of children returned the asthma symptoms questionnaires, and 79% of those children consented to additional testing. Results indicated that the 3-stage procedure had good validity, with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of 82%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. A 2-stage procedure using questionnaires and spirometry had similar validity, with sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of 78%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. However, given the time and expense associated with the 2- or 3-stage procedure and the difficulty of obtaining physician follow-up evaluation of the case-detection diagnosis, schools may prefer to use a 2-item questionnaire that has a lower sensitivity (66%) but higher specificity (96%) and predictive value (95%).

Conclusions: Case-detection programs are generally well received by school personnel and can identify children with unrecognized or undiagnosed disease, as well as those with a current diagnosis but poorly controlled disease. This study yields substantial information regarding the validity, yield, and specific types of children who might be identified with the use of such procedures. For the choice of the method of case detection used in a school, the strengths and weaknesses of each procedure, as well as the resources available for case detection, physician referral, and follow-up procedures, must be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Case-detection procedure.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Results from the validation study.

References

    1. Mannino DM, Homa DM, Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Gwynn C, Redd SC. Surveillance for asthma: United States, 1980–1999. MMWR CDC Surveill Summ. 2002;51:1–13. - PubMed
    1. National Center for Health Statistics . National Health Interview Survey, 2001 (data file and documentation) National Center for Health Statistics; Hyattsville, MD: 2001.
    1. Anderson HR, Bland JM, Patel S, Peckham C. The natural history of asthma in childhood. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1986;40:121–129. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGill KA, Sorkness CA, Fergson-Page C, Gern JE, Havighurst TC, Knipfer B. Asthma in non-inner city Head Start children. Pediatrics. 1998;102:77–83. - PubMed
    1. Speight ANP, Lee DA, Hey EN. BMJ. 1983;286:1253–1256. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types