Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Oct;85(10):1619-24.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.043.

Dynamic analysis of trunk flexion after stroke

Affiliations

Dynamic analysis of trunk flexion after stroke

Sylvie Messier et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To quantify trunk movement and lower-extremity weight bearing in patients with stroke-associated hemiparesis compared with healthy subjects.

Design: Controlled study with 2 groups: persons with hemiparesis and healthy controls.

Setting: Geriatric center offering rehabilitation services.

Participants: A convenience sample of 15 persons with poststroke hemiparesis (age, 69.4+/-12.0y; > or =3mo poststroke; total motor function range, 63-95/100) on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and of 13 healthy persons (age, 67.8+/-7.5y).

Interventions: Subjects were seated on a chair placed on a forceplate with their feet on 2 additional forceplates. A target was placed directly in front of or at a 45 degrees angle from the midline at 66% of the nonparetic/dominant arm length. Subjects' task was to touch the target with their forehead. Main outcome measures Amplitude and speed of trunk movements, displacement of the global center of pressure (COP), and percentage of body weight distributed on the buttocks and the feet.

Results: Despite speed and amplitude comparable to that of the healthy subjects (NS), subjects with hemiparesis (HS) had less COP displacement (HS, 33.7+/-6.9; NS, 40.5+/-9.2), resulting in a lower weight-bearing value on the feet (HS for the paretic foot, 2.3%+/-3.6%; HS for the nonparetic foot, 2.2%+/-2.9%; NS for the nondominant foot, 5.4%+/-3.4%; NS for the dominant foot, 5.2%+/-4.0%).

Conclusions: The similar amplitude of trunk flexion with a decreased displacement of COP and a lower weight bearing on the feet suggest smaller anterior displacement of the body mass. It is possible that trunk movements in persons with hemiparesis are executed by the upper trunk with very little anterior tilt of the pelvis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types