Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2004 Sep-Oct;11(5):551-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2004.06.128.

Comparison of risk stratification with pharmacologic and exercise stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Comparison of risk stratification with pharmacologic and exercise stress myocardial perfusion imaging: a meta-analysis

Sachin M Navare et al. J Nucl Cardiol. 2004 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: Although pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and exercise stress MPI have comparable diagnostic accuracy, their comparative value for risk stratification of patients with known or suspected coronary disease is not known.

Methods and results: The data of 14,918 patients were combined from 24 studies evaluating prognosis in patients undergoing either pharmacologic stress or exercise stress MPI. Studies were included if a 2 x 2 table for hard cardiac events (cardiac death and myocardial infarction [MI]) could be constructed from the data available. Excluded were studies performed for post-MI, post-revascularization, or preoperative risk stratification. A weighted t test was used to compare the cardiac events, and a random effects model was used to calculate summary odds ratios. Summary odds ratios for hard cardiac events were similar for pharmacologic stress and exercise stress MPI. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves also showed no difference in discriminatory power between the stressors. The cardiac event rates were significantly higher with normal and abnormal test results with pharmacologic stress MPI than with exercise stress MPI (1.78% vs 0.65% [P < .001] for normal results and 9.98% vs 4.3% [P < .001] for abnormal results). Subgroup analysis revealed that both cardiac death and nonfatal MI were significantly higher with pharmacologic stress MPI. Patients undergoing pharmacologic stress MPI had a significantly higher prevalence of poor prognostic factors, and meta-regression revealed that exercise capacity was the single most important predictor of cardiac events.

Conclusions: This meta-analysis shows that exercise stress MPI and pharmacologic stress MPI are comparable in their ability to risk-stratify patients. However, patients undergoing pharmacologic stress studies are at a higher risk for subsequent cardiac events. This is true even for those with normal perfusion imaging results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Sep;22(3):665-70 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Nov 1;38(5):1511-7 - PubMed
    1. Circulation. 1998 Dec 22-29;98(25):2836-41 - PubMed
    1. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Sep 1;78(5):562-4 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Cardiol. 1994 May-Jun;1(3):254-61 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources