Prognostic significance of newly acquired bundle branch block after aortic valve replacement

Abstract

There is controversy concerning the prognostic significance of conduction delays that occur after aortic valve replacement (AVR). We retrospectively reviewed 389 consecutive patients who underwent AVR at our institution between April 1995 and March 1997. Adverse events were defined as the occurrence of complete atrioventricular block, syncope, or sudden cardiac death. Among 262 patients included in our database, 31 (11.8%) had a preoperative bundle branch block (BBB) and 41 (15.6%) developed new BBB postoperatively. At a mean follow-up of 54 months, the event rate was 1.6% (3 of 190) in patients with no BBB versus 17% (7 of 41, p = 0.0004) in patients who developed new BBB after surgery. There were 4 events (4 of 15 = 26.6%, p = 0.0006) in patients who developed new left BBB and 3 (3 of 26, 11.5%, p = 0.02) in those who developed new right BBB after AVR. There was also an increased adverse event rate in patients who had preoperative BBB (3 of 31, 9.7%, p = 0.037). By multivariate analysis, a new and persistent BBB acquired after surgery was the only independent predictor of adverse events during follow-up (odds ratio 8.85, p = 0.0004). The highest event rate was seen in patients who developed new left BBB and left axis deviation after surgery. Most events occurred during the first year of follow-up. A new and persistent BBB acquired after AVR is associated with an increased adverse event rate. This finding suggests that early prophylactic pacemaker implantation should be considered in these patients.